Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing Fahim Ahmad vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 5 July, 2006

Shri Ram Chandra Mission & Others vs The State Of U.P. & Others on 10 July, 2015

116. There are two authorities i.e. Fahim Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Single Judge, as also Division Bench in Special Appeal No.462 of 2006 (supra) but here also I find nothing to help the petitioners on the question as above. This judgment is based on one more expression of law that once a power has been exercised by Assistant Registrar or Deputy Registrar, as the case may be, the Registrar cannot re-exercise the power since he does not possess appellate or review power over Deputy Registrar and Assistant Registrar. In fact the term 'Registrar' includes 'Additional Registrar', 'Joint Registrar', 'Deputy Registrar' and 'Assistant Registrar'. Therefore, once power has been exercised by any of the aforesaid authorities, Registrar would cease to have any jurisdiction to either review such power or interfere with power already exercised.
Allahabad High Court Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - S Agarwal - Full Document

C/M Mahatma Gandhi Vidyapeeth/ Late ... vs Registrar, Firm, Societies And Chit ... on 16 June, 2010

However, in the light of the decision rendered in the case of Faheem Ahmad (Supra), I am of the view that the matter requires afresh decision by the Deputy Registrar himself to whom the power to decide such a dispute has been delegated and since the question against the integrity of the Deputy Registrar, Firm, Societies & Chits, U.P., Faizabad was raised earlier. I feel it appropriate to issue direction to the Registrar, Firm, Societies & Chits, Lucknow to place the matter before the Deputy Registrar, Lucknow, who is competent enough to decide the dispute for its decision on merit. In view of the aforesaid decision the orders impugned treating without jurisdiction is being quashed and a direction is issued to the opposite party no. 1 to act upon as aforesaid. It is further directed that the Deputy Registrar to whom the matter is entrusted shall proceed with the case and decide the same on merit expeditiously after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned within 2 months. The parties are directed to place this order before the opposite party no. 1 at an early date for proceeding the same. It is further observed that the Deputy Registrar shall decide the matter afresh without being influenced with the observation made by the Registrar in the order impugned.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Shukla - Full Document

Chhavilal Prajapati vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 18 July, 2023

4. He has further submitted that admittedly, the election process has already started and the date of election is 19.07.2023. He has placed reliance of the decision of this Court in re; MANU/UP/2007/2006 "Fahim Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and Ors." wherein this Court has considered the judgment of Apex Court held that such writ petition may not be maintainable.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R S Chauhan - Full Document
1