Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

St. Francis Convent School, Jalandhar vs Assessee on 8 April, 2014

9) We have heard both the parties and perused the relevant records available with us, especially the impugned orders along with the relevant provisions of the law and the documentary evidences filed by the learned counsel for the assessee in the shape of paper book, containing pages from 1 to 67, in which, he has attached photocopy of Letter dated 23.09.13 of the assessee along with enclosures; Photo Copy of Letter dated 20.09.13 of the assessee along with enclosures; Photo copy of order u/s 10(23C)(vi) dt. 26/27.09.2011 of CCIT, Ludhiana, in the case of St. Francis Convent School, Jandiala Guru; and Photocopy of order u/s 12AA(1) of the CIT-II, Jalandhar, dated 23.09.2013 of three schools i.e. St. Rita's School, Bhojian, Sacred Heart School Chuchakwal and St. Pius School, Lamba Pind. We are of the view that the assessees have filed applications under Section 12A(a) of the Act for registration of trust in prescribed proforma. As per the impugned orders, the learned CIT, Jalandhar-II, Jalandhar, has confronted the decision of Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court passed in the case of St. Francis Convent School Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes & Others in Civil Writ Petition No. 20972 of 2011, dated 14.11.2011. In response to the said decision, learned counsel for the assessees filed his written submission and submitted that the applicants-societies are running schools only and other 9 I.T.A. Nos. 685 to 695(Asr)/2013 than this, the societies are not carrying out any other activities. In support of his contentions, he has also filed an affidavit of Vice President of the Societies along with the photographs of the schools. Learned counsel for the assessees has also requested to learned CIT, Jalandhar-II, Jalandhar, in writing through the reply to depute the Assessing Officer or Inspector for field inquiry in order to further ascertain their contention. In support of the assessee's contention, the learned counsel for the assessees has also filed various case-laws which the learned first appellate authority has mentioned in the impugned order.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Amritsar Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

St Joseph Conventshool vs Cbdt on 19 May, 2015

1. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by respondent No.3- Chief Commissioner of Income Tax withdrawing the approval granted to the petitioner under Section 10(23C)(vi) on 29.1.2008. The impugned order was passed mainly on the basis of a Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 14.11.2011 [in which one of us (G.S.Sandhawalia, J.) is member] in CWP No.20972 of 2011 titled as St.Francis Convent School Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and others.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document
1