Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)
Documents citing Sunil Talwar Murlidhar And Anr. vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 22 February, 1991

Sunil Talwar & Ors vs State & Ors Ca No.54630/16 (97/16) on 2 February, 2019

24. Suffice is to say that the above pleadings coupled with the DIR reveals that the Ld. Trial Court is justified in ordering summoning of the appellants which was accordingly ordered by way of impugned order. The Court finds no impropriety, Result: Petition Dismissed. Page 11 of 12 Sunil Talwar & Ors Vs State & Ors CA No.54630/16 (97/16) illegality or error of finding in the order impugned.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Tanwar vs State on 25 August, 2007

" It is true that Section 156(3) of the Code empowers to Magistrate to direct the police to register a case and intimate investigations but this power has to be exercised judiciously on proper grounds and not in a mechanical manner. In those cases where the allegations are not very serious and the complainant himself is in possession of evidence to prove his allegations there should be no need to pass orders under Section 156(3) of the Code. This discretion ought to be exercised after propose application of mind and only in those cases where the Magistrate is of the view that the nature of the allegations is such that the complainant himself may not be in a position to collect and produce evidence before the Court and interest of justice demand that the police SUNIL TANWAR VS. STATE 5 should step in the help the complainant.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1