Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Rolta Private Limited vs Varanium Cloud Limited on 12 July, 2023

Mrs Meena Vohra vs Master Hosts Pvt Ltd & Ors. on 18 March, 2025

3. According to him, a "commercial dispute" under Section 2(1)(c)(i) of the Act of 2015 pertains to transactions typically involving merchants, financiers, and traders, often characterized by mercantile documents. He emphasises that the Bombay High Court, in Rolta (P) Ltd. v. Varanium Cloud Ltd.,1 held that the nature of a dispute should be determined based on the substance of the case rather than procedural technicalities; and that commercial disputes must necessarily involve commercial transactions.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Deepali Goyal vs Sonal Fabricators Pvt Ltd on 20 December, 2025

involves transactions typically of merchants, financiers, and traders, and emphasized that disputes should be assessed on the substance of the case rather than procedural objections. Similarly, in Rolta (P) Ltd. v. Varanium Cloud Ltd. 2024 SCC Online Bom. 3518 the High Court at Bombay reiterated that a "commercial dispute" under the Act of 2015 must relate to commercial transactions and not personal loans or other non- commercial engagements. In both these cases, the Courts ruled that disputes arising from personal loans, even if advanced for business purposes, do not qualify as "commercial dispute" under the definition provided in Section 2(1)(c) of the Act of 2015.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manav Goyal vs Cryolin Pvt Ltd on 20 December, 2025

involves transactions typically of merchants, financiers, and traders, and emphasized that disputes should be assessed on the substance of the case rather than procedural objections. Similarly, in Rolta (P) Ltd. v. Varanium Cloud Ltd. 2024 SCC Online Bom. 3518 the High Court at Bombay reiterated that a "commercial dispute" under the Act of 2015 must relate to commercial transactions and not personal loans or other non- commercial engagements. In both these cases, the Courts ruled that disputes arising from personal loans, even if advanced for business purposes, do not qualify as "commercial dispute" under the definition provided in Section 2(1)(c) of the Act of 2015.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1