citedby: 1783023

1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)

Documents citing Nazir Ahmmad And Ors. vs Tamijaddi Ahamed And Ors. on 22 March, 1929

Bhusan Chandra Mondal vs Chhabimoni Dasi And Ors. on 29 April, 1948

The question was again considered by a Judge of this Court sitting singly in Harihar Prosad v. Umesh Chandra and the view expressed in Nazir Ahammad v. Tamijaddi Ahammad was followed. A Division Bench of this Court again followed that decision.

Calcutta High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Priyabala Dassi And Anr. vs Sarajubala Choudhurani And Ors. on 27 April, 1936

The same view was taken by a Full Bench of the Madras High Court in Perumal Pillay v. Perumal Chetty 1928 Mad 914, and we are unable to agree with the reason for the decision of the Allahabad High Court in Anmol Singh v. Hari Sankar 1930 All 779, taking a view, contrary to that expressed by this Court in Nazir Ahammad v. Tamijaddi Ahammad 1929 Cal 430, mentioned above, with which we are in entire agreement.

Calcutta High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Anmol Singh And Ors. vs Hari Shankar Lal And Ors. on 11 April, 1930

6. The Calcutta High Court in the case of Nazir Ahammad v. Tamijaddi Ahammad A.I.R. 1929 Cal. 430 has accepted this view.

Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Elokeshee Dasee vs Kunjabihari Basak on 24 February, 1933

In particular, there is the authority of a decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Nazir Ahammad v. Tamijaddi Ahammad to the effect that, after a preliminary decree, a suit does not abate.

Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Bhusan Chandra Mondal vs Chhabimoni Dasi And Ors. on 29 April, 1948

Priyabala Dassi And Anr. vs Sarajubala Choudhurani And Ors. on 27 April, 1936

Anmol Singh And Ors. vs Hari Shankar Lal And Ors. on 11 April, 1930

Elokeshee Dasee vs Kunjabihari Basak on 24 February, 1933