Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Vimla Dvi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical & ... on 12 September, 2014

Krishna Pal vs State Of U.P. on 2 January, 2023

Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and upon perusal of record, it transpires that a first information report came to be lodged against six accused persons including the present applicant. The present applicant is also stated to have demanded dowry and have treated the deceased with cruelty. The cause of death of the deceased, according to postmortem report, is asphyxia due to antemortem hanging. There are no other external or internal injuries on the person of the deceased in the postmortem report. Similarly placed co-accused persons, namely, Smt. Vimla Devi, who is mother-in-law of the deceased, and Guddu @ Raj Kishor, who is brother-in-law of the deceased, have already been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.10.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.45145 of 2022 (Smt. Vimla Devi vs. State of U.P.) and vide order dated 16.12.2022 passed in Criminal Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ghanshyam Singh vs State Of U.P. & 5 Others on 11 December, 2014

Sri Tripathi has further referred to a decision rendered by a Single Judge of this Court in Vimla Devi Vs. State Of U.P. [2014 (1) ADJ 140] to contend that pursuant to a 'no confidence motion', persons who hold an electoral office, cannot be permitted to continue in office inasmuch as the said measure was designed to ensure that an elected representative continues in office only till such time as he enjoys the confidence of the electorate. Referring to para materia provisions contained in the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, the learned Single Judge has, in the aforementioned decision, held that the will of the electorate as reflected in the motion of 'no confidence', is of prime importance and required to be adhered to and consequently objections as to the validity of the notice cannot be considered after the motion of no confidence has been carried.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 5 - D Maheshwari - Full Document

Smt.Gero Devi And Ors vs State on 25 November, 2022

4.4 Learned Counsel also submits that a perusal of the testimonies of P.W. 7-Gorkharam, P.W.9-Andu, P.W.17-Rajendra Prasad would reveal that the place of posting (official duty) of the husband, the residence of the in-laws' and the residence of the deceased victim were all at different places, and therefore, the allegations in question are completely false. 4.5 Learned counsel sought to fortify the submissions made hereinabove by placing reliance on the judgment; rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh .P. v. Sewa Singh 2007 Cr.L.R. (SC) 523; rendered by a Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court, at Jaipur Bench, in the case of Om Prakash Jangid v. State of Rajasthan (2020) 1 RLW (Raj) 484 : Criminal Appeal No.7/2017; rendered by the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in the case of Smt. Vimla Devi v. State of U.P. 2007 (1) Crimes 618.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document

Smt Urmila Devi vs North Eastern Railway on 15 April, 2025

In the case of Smt. Vimla Devi Vs. State of U.P. & 04 others in Writ-A No.14003 of 2022, the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in their order dated 15.09.2022 have taken up the similar issue. In this case, the writ petitioner claims to be the second wife of late Manoj Kumar, who was working as Assistant Teacher in Janta Junior High School, Faridpur (Audhan) Newada, Distict Kaushambi who married late Manoj Kumar during the survival of first wife of late Manoj Kumar namely Smt. Pushpa Devi who was reported to be insane for many years and petitioner who happens to be the real younger sister of Smt. Pushpa Devi who was married to the late Manoj Kumar by the father of the petitioner.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Janam @ Ram Janam Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 7 Others on 3 January, 2023

The writ petition stands allowed and the matter is remanded back before the respondent no.3 to decide Case No.955/2018 (Computerized Case No.D2017165300955) (Vimla Devi vs. State of U.P.), under Section 30 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 afresh after affording opportunity of proper hearing to both the parties as well as after calling fresh report of the revenue authority, in accordance with law. The aforementioned case shall be decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of production of the certified copy of the order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Vimla Devi vs State Of U.P. Through Its Secretary ... on 29 March, 2024

1. The appeal is directed against the order dated 29.11.2023 passed in Writ-C No. 37657 of 2023 (Smt. Vimla Devi versus State of U.P. and 5 others) whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by holding that the petitioner-complainant has no locus to file such petition based on Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Vivekanand Yadav versus State of U.P. and another [2010 (10) ADJ 1 (FB)].
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next