citedby: 178462352

Vishnu Kumar Tiwari vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 9 July, 2019

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State10, a learned Judge of the High Court of Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 97 - K Joseph - Full Document

Narayanamma vs Chikka Venkateshaiah on 13 August, 2019

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State10, a learned Judge of the High Court of Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Madras High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 12 - N A Venkatesh - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Tyagi And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 8 December, 2020

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State, a learned Judge of the High Court of Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Allahabad High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 1 - V C Dixit - Full Document

S.Mohan vs Mr. Antony Gomes on 21 January, 2022

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State, a learned Judge of the High Court of Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Ajeet Kumar Saxena vs S. Jayashree on 23 March, 2017

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State10, a learned Judge of the High Court of Page 13 / 22 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7218 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos.5220 and 5221of 2017 Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 3 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Ajeet Kumar Saxena vs S. Jayashree on 23 March, 2017

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State10, a learned Judge of the High Court of Page 13 / 22 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7218 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos.5220 and 5221of 2017 Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Ajeet Kumar Saxena vs S. Jayashree

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State10, a learned Judge of the High Court of Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Santhanakumar vs The State Rep on 24 February, 2023

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State10, a learned Judge of the High Court of Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Madras High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Santhanakumar vs The State Rep on 24 February, 2023

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State10, a learned Judge of the High Court of Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Madras High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Reserved On: 04.04.2024 vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir Th.Director on 20 April, 2024

In Mahabir Prasad Agarwala v. State, a learned Judge of the High Court of Orissa, took the view that a protest petition is in the nature of a complaint and should be examined in accordance with provisions of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - S Kumar - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results