Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.76 seconds)
Documents citing Harbir Singh Dhindsa Son Of Sh. Ajit ... vs State Of Punjab Through The Secretary ... on 28 July, 2011

Kulwinder Singh vs The Punjab State And Anr on 18 February, 2026

4 of 25 ::: Downloaded on - 20-02-2026 00:19:14 ::: 5 RSA-2525 of 1994 19 He contended that the order passed by the respondents dispensing with the departmental artmental enquiry enquiry is wholly laconic and does not germane to the requirements of Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India requirements India, as the satisfaction recorded in the order of dismissal was not supported by any independent material so as to justify the dispen dispensing with the departmental enquiry. He contended that order of dismissal was wholly arbitrary and was an attempt to deprive the appellant of his rights conferred by Article 311(2), 311(2), namely, the right to have a fair hearing before imposition of extreme penalty of dismissal from service, which is an extreme act against an employee. He further contended that the action of the authorities was in violation of provisions of Rule Rules 16.1 and 16.24 of the Punjab Police Rules,, 1934 1934. He contended that judgment and an decree passed by the first appellate Court being perverse are liable to be set aside. Learned counsel in support of his contentions relied upon the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jaswant Singh v. State of Punjab and others, 1991 1991(1) SCC 362; Risal Singh v. State of Haryana and others, 201 2014(13) SCC 244; judgment of Division bench of this Court in Darshan Jit Singh Dhindsa v. State of Punjab and others, (1993) 1 SLR 209 and judgments of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Police and an another v. Jagmal Singh, 2024 NCDHC 2259;
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1