G.Shanthi vs Halima John on 4 June, 2018
Similarly, in support of his contentions, the defendant's counsel placed reliance upon the decisions reported in AIR 1987 Supreme Court 2328 (Parakunnan Veetill Joseph's Son Mathew Vs. Nedumbara Kuruvila's Son and others), (2008) 6 MLJ 587 (Periyaya Vs. M.Rajagopal and Another), the order of the Supreme Court dated 19.02.2008 passed in W.P.(Civil) 290 of 2001 ( Thiruvengada Pillai Vs. Navaneethammal & Anr.), the order of the Allahabad High Court dated 27.05.2013 passed in Civil Revision No.214 of 2013 (Dr.Dinesh Chandra Vs. Krishna Kumar Goel) and the order of this Court dated 19.06.2014 passed in S.A.No.965 of 2004 (Samporanam and two others Vs. R.Senapathi and another). The principles of law outlined in the abovesaid decisions are taken into consideration and followed as applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case at hand.