Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

Bangur Brothers Limited (In ... vs Unknown on 27 February, 2015

A further decision, reported at (2010) 3 CHN 524 (East India Trading Company v. Radha Kanta Dhar) has been cited by the applicants for the proposition that when a landlord applies for disclaimer against the official liquidator in control of the assets and properties of a company in liquidation on the ground that the company in liquidation had wrongfully sub-let the tenanted premises, the landlord has to be left free to file a suit to obtain the eviction of the sub-tenant. Neither judgment is an authority for the proposition that the company court cannot direct the eviction of any person from an immoveable property where the company in liquidation is a landlord or a tenant.
Calcutta High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - S Banerjee - Full Document

Bangur Brothers Ltd. (In Ltqn) & Pdgd ... vs Official Liquidator & Anr on 16 November, 2017

In East India Trading Company-vs.-Radha Kanta Dhar (supra), a Division Bench of this Court held that there was nothing wrong in the learned Company Judge granting liberty to the landlord to file a suit for eviction against the occupant of a premises of which the company in liquidation was a tenant while refusing to grant relief under Sec. 535 of the Companies Act.
Calcutta High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1