Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 140 (0.04 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Subhash @ Pappu on 1 April, 2022

State vs Pappu on 12 August, 2025

33. In respect of PW-1 i.e., the complainant, there are imputations by way of suggestions during cross-examination that the complainant is falsely implicating the accused because the complainant did not pay daily wages to the accused. During cross-examination a different stand has been taken by the accused wherein he states that he was inside the house of the complainant lawfully for doing some work, however, in his statement u/s 313 CrPC, the accused states that he was merely going through the street. Thus the stand taken by the accused is not consistent. Except for bald statements there is nothing on record to suggest that the FIR No. 334/2015 State vs. Pappu Page No. 16 of 25 CNR No. DLWT02-000802-2015 complainant is trying to falsely implicate the accused. It is well settled law that the complainant cannot be stated to be an interested witness unless and until any cogent motive to falsely implicate the accused is imputed and proved on the basis of preponderance of probabilities. Moreover, accused was duly identified by the complainant. No material or evidence has been placed on record to show any animosity or even prior acquaintance between PW-1, the complainant and the accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Pappu on 31 March, 2023

27. Further, PW2/ASI Giriraj Prasad in his testimony had interalia deposed that on the date of incident, he had reached at the spot. He met PW1, who handed over him the recovered case property i.e. illicit liquor. Thereafter, he had prepared rukka Ex. PW2/B, counted illicit liquor, took out sample and prepared M-29 form at the spot. Thereafter, he seized the case property vide seizure memo Ex. PW1/F and sealed the same. Thereafter, FIR No. 1399/2015 State Vs. Pappu Page No. 13 of 14 he had sent PW1 to the PS with rukka for registration of FIR. Perusal of his testimony would clear show that he had seized the case property before the registration of FIR.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Pappu on 15 October, 2024

8. In order to establish the guilt of accused, prosecution is primarily relying upon the testimonies of PW-1, PW-2, PW-3 & PW-4. Pertinently, the mere perusal of testimonies of PW-2 and PW-3 would reflect that both the above-named witnesses have clearly rules out that the recovery of alleged country made pistol was effected from accused in their presence and rather both the above-named witnesses coherently deposed that they were informed by PW-1 regarding the recovery of country made pistol from the possession of accused. The detailed and extensive cross-examination of both the above-named witnesses could not yield any fruitful results for prosecution and hence, the testimonies of both the above-named witnesses is of no avail to establish the case of prosecution. Further, it is also evident from the testimony of PW-4 that he did not witness the alleged recovery of country made pistol from possession of accused and rather the accused was taken to him by PWs 1, 2 & 3 after the alleged recovery was effected from him, hence, the factum of FIR No.214/2013 Digitally signed State Vs. Pappu. RISHABH by RISHABH KAPOOR PS : Mangol Puri 8/13 KAPOOR Date: 2024.10.15 15:28:29 +0530 Page 9 of 13 alleged recovery of country made pistol from accused cannot be said to be established from the testimony of PW-4 also. Now, only the testimony of PW-1 has been left, on the basis of which the prosecution is purporting to establish its case. The careful perusal of testimony of PW-1 goes on to suggest that the alleged recovery of country made pistole was affected from accused during the course of school assembly in which a large number of school students and teachers were present but surprisingly, no such school students and other teachers who were alleged present at the time of recovery of alleged country made pistol from accused were associated in the investigation of the case for the reasons unexplained. Even no sincere efforts appear to have been made by the IO to join the aforesaid school students and teachers as the recovery witnesses. No reasonable explanation has come from IO qua reasons for abovementioned crucial lapses on his part. Even the sample seal which was stated to be used by the IO in sealing the alleged country made pistol, has not seen the light of the day. No explanation has been offered by the prosecution as to whom the seal of Mark "RT" belonged. None of the prosecution witnesses have deposed anything regarding the handing over of seal to any of the independent witnesses after its use.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pappu Singh And 7 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 11 August, 2025

13. Having considered the aforesaid, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. The entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 1127 of 2024 (State vs. Pappu and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 683 of 2022, under sections 2/3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S. Iglas, District Aligarh, pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Iglas, Aligarh, are hereby quashed qua the applicants.
Allahabad High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Santram vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Depart. ... on 13 September, 2022

Based upon the instructions, Sri Upendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has stated that over Gata No. 118 area 0.256 Hectre, which is recorded as "road" in the revenue record and over which some persons were found encroachers and against these encroachers the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The cases registered against these persons are computerized case nos. T201708150503142 (State Vs. Ruseram), T201708150503141 (State Vs. Pappu), T201708150503143 (State Vs. Rakesh) and T201708150503140 (State Vs. Ram Keval) and on 15.11.2021, these cases were decided.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next