Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 61 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P. vs Anuj And 2 Others on 18 July, 2022

State vs Anuj @ Banda on 26 November, 2025

Digitally ANEEZA signed by BISHNOI ANEEZA Cr. Case 9159/2021 State Vs. Anuj & Ors. Page 8 of 9 BISHNOI It is a settled law that a disclosure statement of a co-accused has no evidentiary value unless it leads to a lawful and proved recovery. In the present matter, no independent public witness was joined at the time of the alleged pointing out or recovery. All material witnesses to recovery are police officials and their depositions remain uncorroborated by any independent source. It further emerges from the testimonies of PW-3, PW-4 and PW-5 that there is no CCTV footage, no eyewitness, and no public witness, despite the alleged recovery having taken place in a residential locality. The prosecution has offered no explanation for non-joining of public witnesses, which raises a serious doubt regarding the genuineness of the alleged recovery.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajni Devi vs State Of U.P. And Another on 15 November, 2022

It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may also be pleased to stay the effect and operation of impugned order dated 02-09-2022 as well as further proceeding in Sessions Trial no. 1504 of 2020 State of U.P. vs Anuj in Case Crime No. 332 of 2020, U/s 376 IPC, P.S. Bhognipur, District Kanpur Dehat, during the pendency of instant application before this Hon'ble Court, otherwise the applicant shall suffer an irreparable loss."
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - K S Pawar - Full Document

Anuj And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 October, 2023

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceedings including charge sheet dated 18.07.2022 in Case No. 9319 of 2022 (State Vs. Anuj and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 265 of 2022, under sections 323, 504, 308/34 of IPC, Police Station Pilkhuwa, District Hapur pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur in view of compromise dated 06.10.2022.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - D Pathak - Full Document

Anuj Mehraur And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 11 October, 2023

Accordingly, the entire proceeding of charge sheet dated 23.11.2019 along with cognizance order dated 24.12.2019 as well as entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 48770 of 2019 (State vs. Anuj Mehraur and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 11 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S.-Bajariya, District Kanpur Nagar, pending in the Court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate Kanpur Nagar, is, hereby, quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anuj Pratap Singh Alias Chauwa vs State Of U.P. And Another on 19 March, 2025

It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the further proceeding of Special Session Trial No. 19A of 2016 (State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Anuj Pratap) arising out of Case crime no. 524 of 2015, under section 366,376D, 377, 395, 412,34 IPC and 66 IT Act, Police Station Fatehgarh, DistrictFarrukhabad during pendency of the present criminal misc. application before this Hon'ble Court.And/or may pass any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Anuj Verma vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 7 November, 2024

8. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. The entire criminal proceedings of Case no. 691/2016 (State vs. Anuj) arising out of Case Crime no. 39/2015 under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S.- Bakshi ka Talab, District- Lucknow as well as the charge-sheet no. 35/15 dated 06.02.2015 and the cognizance order dated 19.02.2015 are hereby quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next