Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (2.22 seconds)
Documents citing Rajan Yadav vs State Of U.P. on 18 March, 2021

Rajan (Minor ) vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 August, 2021

Keeping in view the aforementioned legal position and the fact that in this case no such conditions exists, on the basis of which the bail application of a juvenile can be dismissed, therefore, the revision deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. order dated 3.10.2020 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court No. 4, Kushinagar at Padrauna in Juvenile Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2020 (Rajan Vs. State of U.P.) by which the judgment and order dated 19.8.2020 passed by Principal Magistrate Juvenile Justice Board Kushinagar at Padrauna rejecting the bail of revisionist under sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and section 3/4 o POCSO Act, P.S. Taryasujan, District Kushinagar are hereby set aside.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - G Chowdhary - Full Document

Bhoora @ Harish vs State Of U.P. on 11 August, 2021

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that there is a cross version of the present incident and the First Information Report has also been registered from the side of the applicant. It is argued that five persons have been received injuries from the side of the applicant and there are six injured persons from the side of the prosecution and one persons has lost his life. It is argued that although in the First Information Report common and general role has been assigned to all the accused persons but later on in the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. the applicant has been assigned the role of having sword with him and the specific role of firing has been assigned to co-accused Suresh. It is argued that co-accused Ramesh, Rajan and Deepak have been granted bail by different Benches of this Court vide orders dated 08.12.2020, 08.12.2020 and 09.09.2020 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application Nos. 41287 of 2020 (Ramesh Vs. State of U.P.), 41117 of 2020 (Rajan Vs. State of U.P.)
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document

Virendra Kumar Yadav vs Regional Transport Authority Mirzapur ... on 3 January, 2023

Considering the facts and circumstances, enumerated above, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Sri Rajan Yadav (supra). The respondent authority shall process the application for compounding subject to deposit of Rupees Five Thousand by the petitioner, in accordance with law ignoring the delay occurred therefor.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gopi Chand vs Regional Transport Authority And 3 ... on 3 January, 2023

Considering the facts and circumstances, enumerated above, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Sri Rajan Yadav (supra). The respondent authority shall process the application for compounding subject to deposit of Rupees Five Thousand by the petitioner, in accordance with law ignoring the delay occurred therefor.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Yadav vs Regional Transport Authority And 3 ... on 3 January, 2023

Considering the facts and circumstances, enumerated above, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Sri Rajan Yadav (supra). The respondent authority shall process the application for compounding subject to deposit of Rupees Five Thousand by the petitioner, in accordance with law ignoring the delay occurred therefor.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Virendra Kumar Yadav vs Regional Transport Authority Mirzapur ... on 3 January, 2023

Considering the facts and circumstances, enumerated above, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Sri Rajan Yadav (supra). The respondent authority shall process the application for compounding subject to deposit of Rupees Five Thousand by the petitioner, in accordance with law ignoring the delay occurred therefor.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surendra Kumar Yadav vs Regional Transport Authority on 3 January, 2023

Considering the facts and circumstances, enumerated above, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Sri Rajan Yadav (supra). The respondent authority shall process the application for compounding subject to deposit of Rupees Five Thousand by the petitioner, in accordance with law ignoring the delay occurred therefor.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ankit Tripathi vs Regional Transport Authority And 3 ... on 5 January, 2023

Considering the facts and circumstances, enumerated above, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Sri Rajan Yadav (supra). The respondent authority shall process the application for compounding subject to deposit of Rupees Five Thousand, against each challan, by the petitioner, in accordance with law ignoring the delay occurred therefor.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next