Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 146 (1.32 seconds)
Documents citing Rambraksh @ Jalim vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 12 May, 2016

Laxman & Anr. vs The State Of M.P. on 19 April, 2018

16. The trial Court has also held that there is a last seen evidence and on the basis of circumstantial evidence. The evidence produced by the prosecution in this regard is sufficient to hold the appellants guilty for commission of offence of murder beyond reasonable doubt. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rambraksh Alias Jalim Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [2016 (12) SCC 251] has held as under
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - A Palo - Full Document

Motkari Ramulu vs The State Of A.P Rep., By Its Pp on 23 November, 2018

25. Coming to the expression in Rambraksh's case (supra 2), there deceased went to the accused on 07.10.1992 and did not return and on 14.10.1992 clothes and shoes of deceased found in field and skeleton remains found and wife of deceased named appellant and another last seen with deceased taking him away is very doubtful from the belated F.I.R. long after the last seen theory. Here the facts are entirely different as discussed supra of the case on hand.
Telangana High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surajbai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 October, 2024

In Bodhraj v. State of J&K, Rambraksh v. State of Chhattisgarh, Anjan Kumar Sarma v. State of Assam following principle of law, in this regard, has been enunciated: (Shailendra Rajdev Pasvan case, SCC OnLine Guj para 16) "16. ...The last seen theory comes into play where the time gap between the point of time when the accused and deceased were seen last alive and when the deceased is found dead is so small that possibility of any person other than the accused being the author of crime becomes impossible. It would be Signature Not Verified Signed by: ARUN KUMAR MISHRA Signing time: 16-10-2024 18:34:18 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2024:MPHC-JBP:50470 8 Cr.A. No.122/2011 difficult in some cases to positively establish that the deceased was last seen with the accused when there is a long gap and possibility of other persons coming in between exists. In the absence of any other positive evidence to conclude that accused and deceased were last seen together, it would be hazardous to come to a conclusion of guilt in those cases."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 76 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next