Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Bank Of Bihar Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Buxar Municipality And ... on 28 July, 1965

Their Lordships approved the view taken by Jack, J. in Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India, Ltd. v. Sudhansu Bhusan Chatterjee, AIR 1936 Cal 477 and held that the imposition of the tax by the Jalpaiguri Municipality was quite valid and there was no ground for setting aside the conviction and sentence of the petitioners. This decision is be all fours and I have already indicated that as to whether any profit accrued to the present petitioner within the limits of the Buxar Municipality is immaterial. It should be mentioned here that Section 82 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act corresponds with some minor changes to Section 123 of the Bengal Municipal Act, 1932. Clause (f) of Section 123 of the Bengal Municipal Act gave power to the Commissioners to imposs tax on the trades, professions and callings specified in Schedule 4 at such rates as may be fixed by the Commissioners within the maximum lates fixed in the said schedule. Clause (ff) of Section 82 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act also authorises the Commissioners to impose such taxes and the word "employments" has been added in Clause (ff). The charging Section 150-A of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act corresponds substantially to Section 182 of the Bengal Municipal Act. Schedule 4 of each Act lays down the scale of taxes.
Patna High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Municipal Commissioners vs Baranagore Jute Factory Co. Ltd. on 3 February, 1937

For example in the case in Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India v. Sudhansu Bhusan Chatterjee , referred to by the learned counsel for the appellants it was held that the company was carrying on a trade in Howrah though all their contracts and sales were made in Calcutta. There however the Oil Distributing Company delivered oil to customers from their storage godowns in Howrah, and therefore it could be said that part of their trade (i.e. exchange of goods for money) was conducted there. In conclusion, though I do not agree with all reasoning of the learned Judges in the Courts below, I think their conclusion is right and that the respondent company is not liable to tax under the provisions of Section 182, Bengal Municipal Act. This appeal is therefore dismissed with costs.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1