Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Anjali Goswami & Ors. vs Registrar General, Delhi High Court on 30 January, 2019

16. The examination scheme considered by the Division Bench in the said decision was, more or less, the same as the one with which we are concerned. Like in the present case, the examination scheme for the said W.P.(C.) No.963/2019 Page 8 of 21 examination also provided that for each correct answer, the candidate would be awarded one mark each and for each wrong answer, 0.25 marks would be deducted. The Division Bench proceeded to take note of the law with regard to the scope and ambit of judicial review when a Multiple Choice Question paper and its answer key are questioned. The Division Bench observed as follows:
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 77 - V Sanghi - Full Document

Vinay Kumar vs Union Of India And Ors on 26 November, 2024

16. The examination scheme considered by the Division Bench in the said decision was, more or less, the same as the one with which we are concerned. Like in the present case, the examination scheme for the said examination also provided that for each correct answer, the candidate would be awarded one mark each and for each wrong answer, 0.25 marks would be deducted. The Division Bench proceeded to take note of the law with regard to the scope and ambit of judicial review when a Multiple Choice Question paper and its answer key are questioned. The Division Bench observed as follows:
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document
1