citedby: 180210383

Sri Anil Kumar vs The Assistant Commissioner on 12 July, 2024

(g) A petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC to challenge the proceedings initiated under the D.V. Act, 2005 is not maintainable, as established in the case of Arun Daniel &Ors. v. Suganya(supra).

Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balasaheb Patil vs Smt. Soni @ Sonia Patil on 12 July, 2024

(g) A petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC to challenge the proceedings initiated under the D.V. Act, 2005 is not maintainable, as established in the case of Arun Daniel &Ors. v. Suganya(supra).

Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Basanagouda vs Smt. Soni @ Sonia Patil on 12 July, 2024

(g) A petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC to challenge the proceedings initiated under the D.V. Act, 2005 is not maintainable, as established in the case of Arun Daniel &Ors. v. Suganya(supra).

Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sony @Sonia Patil vs The Assistant Commissioner on 12 July, 2024

(g) A petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC to challenge the proceedings initiated under the D.V. Act, 2005 is not maintainable, as established in the case of Arun Daniel &Ors. v. Suganya(supra).

Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M.Mohammed Abzar vs A.M.Nisha on 9 February, 2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 13/16 C.R.P.(MD)No.113 of 2024 “12.Regarding the petitioner's prayer for dispensing with their personal appearance, it is necessary to refer the following direction in Arul Daniel's case above referred.

Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - G Ilangovan - Full Document

Husain Zoeb Manasawala And Anr vs Siddiqua Husain Manasawala And Anr on 26 February, 2024

The judgment of Full Bench of Madras High Court in the case of Arun Daniel(supra) has persuasive value but it does not bind this Court. For the reasons recorded hereinabove, with utmost respect to the Full Bench of Madras High Court, this Court does not concur with the said judgment.

Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Amit Prabhakar Dhawale And Ors vs Pallavi Amit Dhawale And Anr on 26 February, 2024

The judgment of Full Bench of Madras High Court in the case of Arun Daniel(supra) has persuasive value but it does not bind this Court. For the reasons recorded hereinabove, with utmost respect to the Full Bench of Madras High Court, this Court does not concur with the said judgment.

Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Lilavati Shantilal Modi And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 February, 2024

The judgment of Full Bench of Madras High Court in the case of Arun Daniel(supra) has persuasive value but it does not bind this Court. For the reasons recorded hereinabove, with utmost respect to the Full Bench of Madras High Court, this Court does not concur with the said judgment.

Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Shivraj Bapusaheb Bhosale And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 February, 2024

The judgment of Full Bench of Madras High Court in the case of Arun Daniel(supra) has persuasive value but it does not bind this Court. For the reasons recorded hereinabove, with utmost respect to the Full Bench of Madras High Court, this Court does not concur with the said judgment.

Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

D.Chandran vs Gengalakshmi on 14 December, 2023

13. Regarding the petitioners' prayer for dispensing with their personal appearance, it is necessary to refer the following direction in Arul Daniel's case above referred, “76. .....

Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results