Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing Rose Educational Scientific And ... vs Union Of India And Others on 8 May, 1989

Dr. V.N. Gupta Charitable Trust And ... vs Delhi Development Authority And Others on 16 August, 1996

This was the rate at which hospitals were allotted lands in the year in which the on was moved i.e. 1985. The petitioners, however, in order to avoid any controversy and in view of the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated May 8, 1989 in the case of Rose Educational Scientific and Cultural Society Registered v. Union of India, , deposited a sum of Ks. 4,85,750/ - calculated at the rate of Rs. 9.5 lacs per acre as decided by the Court in the above said case. The said amount was deposit-ed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners to claim the refund of such amount as may become payable to them on finalisation of the dispute with regard to the rate. The petitioners through the present writ petition want the quashment of the direction given to them vide letter dated July 4, 1989 whereby they were asked to deposit the remaining amount of Rs. 4,82,750/- along-with interest at the rate of 18% per annum (vide Annexure R) and the allotment order dated November 17,1988 (vide Annexure-L) allotting them land at the rate of Rs. 19 lac per acre.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Jaipur Golden Charitable Clinical vs Dda & Ors. on 9 December, 2009

12. The appellant pleaded estoppel. The appellant relied upon two decisions. The first being by a learned Single Judge of this Court and the second by a Division Bench of this LPA No.82/2003 Page 6 of 14 Court. The former is reported as AIR 1990 Delhi 75 Rose Education Scientific & Cultural Society (Regd.) Vs. UOI and the later is reported as AIR 1991 Delhi 96 DDA Vs. Lala Amarnath Educational & Human Society & Anr.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - P Nandrajog - Full Document

St. Xavier'S Sr. Sec. School vs Municipal Corporation Through Its ... on 24 September, 2010

This judgment shall dispose of (1) CWP No.6651 of 2007 titled St. Xavier's Sr. Sec. School, Sector 44, Chandigarh, and others Vs. Municipal Corporation and another, (2) CWP No.6038 of 2009 St. John's High School, Sector 26, Chandigarh Vs. Union of India and others, (3) CWP No.6822 of 2010 titled DAV College Trust and Management Society, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi and another Vs. Municipal Corporation Chandigarh and others, (4) CWP No.10295 of 2008 titled Dev Samaj College for Women, Sector 45-B, Chandigarh Vs. Municipal Corporation and another (5) CWP No.9952 of 2008 titled S.D. High School, Sector 24-C, Chandigarh Vs. Municipal Corporation and others, (6) CWP No.304 of 2009 titled DAV College Trust and Management Society, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi and another Vs. Municipal Corporation Chandigarh and others, (7) CWP No.16698 of 2008 titled Divya Educational Society and others Vs. Union of India and others, (8) CWP No.323 of 2009 titled DAV College Trust and Management Society, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi and another Vs. Municipal Corporation Chandigarh and others, (9) CWP No.306 of 2009 titled DAV College Trust and Management Society, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi and another Vs. Municipal Corporation Chandigarh and others, (10) CWP No.390 of 2009 titled DAV College Trust and Management Society, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi and another Vs. Municipal Corporation Chandigarh and others, (11) CWP No.6502 of 2009 titled Vivek High School Vs. Municipal Corporation and another, (12) CWP No.10142 of 2007 titled Vishesh Educational Society (Regd.) Vs. Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh and others (13) CWP No.938 CWP No.6651 of 2007 -3- of 2010 titled Gyandeep Public School, Sector 20, Chandigarh Vs. Union of India and others, (14) CWP No.9753 of 2008 titled Shri Guru Gobind Singh Senior Secondary School, Sector 35-B, Chandigarh and another Vs. Municipal Corporation and others, (15) CWP No.9754 of 2008 titled Gurdwara Ashthapan Committee (Regd.) Sector 22, Chandigarh and others Vs. Municipal Corporation and others, (16) CWP No.16070 of 2007 titled Sri Guru Gobind Singh college of Pharmacy, Sector 26, Chandigarh Vs. Municipal Corporation and another, (17) CWP No.13969 of 2007 titled Guru Gobind Singh College for women, Sector 26, Chandigarh Vs. Municipal Corporation and another, (18) CWP No.8246 of 2007 titled Dayanand Anglo Vedic (DAV) College Trust and Management Society and others Vs. Municipal Corporation and others, (19) CWP No.9018 of 2007 titled St. Joseph Educational and Charitable Trust and others Vs. Union of India and others, (20) CWP No.16025 of 2007 titled Sri Guru Gobind Singh Collegiate Public School, Sector 26, Chandigarh Vs. Municipal Corporation and another, (21) CWP No.13910 of 2007 titled Sri Guru Gobind Singh College, Sector 26, Chandigarh Vs. Municipal Corporation and another (22) CWP No.9519 of 2008 titled Kids 'R' Kids International Educational & Social Welfare Trust, Sector 42, Chandigarh and others Vs. Union of India and others and (23) CWP No.9875 of 2008 titled I.S. Dev Samaj Public School, Sector 21-C, Chandigarh Vs. Municipal Corporation and another, as common questions of law and facts are involved.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Moti Bagh Mutual Aid Educational (Vidya ... vs Delhi Development Authority And Anr. on 3 December, 1990

(1) In this writ petition rule nisi was issued on 11.5.1989. No counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents. On 21.9.1989 it was ordered that the main writ petition be listed for hearing on 26.9.1989 at number 1. This was because counsel for the petitioner and the respondents - were in agreement that this case was covered by the decision in the case of Rose Educational Scientific & Cultural Society (Regd.) and others v. Union of India and others reported in 1989 Vol. 38 Dlt at page 344. The final hearing of this matter was got adjourned for the reason that an Lpa had been filed against the aforesaid judgment. That appeal has been decided on 5.9.1990 and the judgment of the learned single Judge has been upheld.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

V.N. Gupta Charitable Trust vs Delhi Development Authority on 1 August, 1996

(1) With the said end in view the petitioner No.2 moved the application for allotment of land before the respondent No.1 ( vide application dated July 15,1985) . Later on the case of the petitioners was also sponsored as per the requirement for the allotment of land by respondent No.3 i.e. the Directorate of Health Services, Delhi Administration through their letter dated February 26,1988. The petitioners were allotted a plot of half an acre of land vide letter dated March 23,1989 ( Annexure N) as per their request made vide letter dated January 13,1989 ( vide Annexure M) at the rate of Rs.19 lacs per acre. The petitioners were, however, very much dis-satisfied with the rate i.e. Rs. 19 lacs per acre which was being charged from them. According to the petitioners they should have been charged at the rate of Rs. 10,000.00 per acre. This was the rate at which hospitals were being allotted lands in the year in which the application was moved i.e. 1985. The petitioners, however, in order to avoid any controversy and in view of the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated May 8,1985 in the case of Rose Educational Scientific and Cultural Society Registered and others v. Union of India and others, ( Cwp No.401/89), deposited a sum of Rs. 4,85,750.00 calculated at the rate of Rs. 9.5 lacs per acre as decided by the Court in the above said case. The said amount was deposited without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners to claim the refund of such amount as may become payable to them on finalisation of the dispute with regard to the rate. The petitioners through the present writ petition want the quashment of the direction given to them vide letter dated July 4,1989 whereby they were asked to deposit the remaining amount of Rs. 4,82,750.00 alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum ( vide Annexure R) and the allotment order dated November 17,1988 ( vide Annexure L) allotting them land at the rate of Rs. 19 lac per acre.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Holiday Club vs Delhi Development Authority And Ors. on 22 September, 2003

19. The basis of the judgment in Rose Educational Scientific And Cultural Society (Regd.) & Ors.'s case (supra) was that once the institutional rates of no profit no loss were applied and allotment letter issued, the expression " difference of cost" would only mean such increase of cost of land. The original cost of Rs. 8 lacs per acre was determined on no profit no loss basis. Thus, the permissible increase was also on the same basis and the increase was upheld only to the extent of Rs. 9.5 lacs per acre. This is also so in the present case as would be apparent from the letter of allotment dated 22.09.1987. Admittedly, it is the institutional rates of no profit no loss which have been made applicable while charging the petitioner @ Rs. 8 lacs per acre.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S K Kaul - Full Document

Creative Entrepreneurs vs Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. on 25 August, 2004

Reliance has also been placed on Rose Educational Scientific and Cultural Society (Regd.) and Others vs. UOI and Others, for the proposition that the rates or the terms of an agreement cannot be unilaterally altered. Similar views have also been expressed in M/s. Magnum Films vs. M/s. Golcha Properties Pvt. Ltd., . Whether it was open to the Respondents to alter the rates is a question which will necessarily have to be adjudicated upon by the learned Arbitrator.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - V Sen - Full Document
1   2 Next