Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.41 seconds)

Prashant Sharma vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 23 August, 2016

(CA 57480/16 Prashant Sharma Vs. The State) Page 1 of4 Shri Rajiv Mehra, ASJ, Central. The said appeal appears to have been disposed off vide order dated 21.7.16 with observation that as challan of the convict had been disposed off by court of Rohini, only the Sessions court at Rohini shall deal with the appeal in question. The appeal accordingly was dismissed only on the legal point alone. Subsequently appellant had preferred the present appeal. 3 In view of aforesaid facts delay in filing the present appeal stands condoned. After the appeal was received on assignment before this court, TCR was summoned and thereafter arguments advanced were heard.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bharat vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 4 July, 2022

4. Further, the fact that after the registration of FIR threats were given to withdraw the case is also not reflected in the supplementary statements recorded. Statement of the complainant is further required to be discarded for the reason she signed her statement Ex.PW-1/A and if as per her version her hand was hurt due to throwing of acid she could not have signed her statement. There are improvements in the statements of the other witnesses also i.e. PW-3 and PW-8. Statements of alleged eye-witnesses PW-4 and PW-5 were recorded by the Police only on 12th August, 2013 after 5 days of the incident. There is no explanation that how the clothes of the victim got torn within one week. Further, the prosecution has not been able to prove the recovery of the alleged bike as well. Reliance is placed on the decisions Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ATISH GOEL CRL.A. 723/2017 and CRL.A. 731/2017 Page 3 of 11 Signing Date:04.07.2022 17:11:11 in Harbeer Singh Vs. Sheshpal & Ors. Crl.A.No. 1624-1625 of 2013; Sachin Vs. State of Maharashtra Crl.A. 248/2016; Sonu Arora Vs. State (2010) 173 DLT 326 (DB); Parvat Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Crl.A. 374/2020; Sampath Kumar Vs. Inspector of Police Krishnagiri (2012) 4 SCC 124; Chunthuram Vs. Stae of Chattisgarh Crl.A. 1392/2011; The State of Karnataka Vs. S. Nagaratna Crl.A. 384/2006 and Devi Prasad Sharma Vs. State 61 (1996) DLT 678.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - M Gupta - Full Document
1