Max Financial Service Limited , ... vs Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 31 March, 2021
4) C I T Vs. Mod i I nd us tr ie s Li mite d ,( 1 99 4 ) 2 1 0 I TR 1
(D e l ) (F B )
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.73 seconds)Sri V Ramappa S/O Venkatesh Nayaka vs Sri K Krishnappa By Lrs Smt Parvathamma on 7 August, 2009
2. Sri B.Veerappa, learned
petitioner contends that the err:o'n'eous
and hence interferenceVis;,g;alie§"fo.r_;': 'H'e__conterr*osAv'that no
new grounds are sought be emendment is
necessary in orei~-err:-to proceedings.
Hence, 2n.rv**sup_pVort o¢§VV.hie.'bc.onte'nt§.on he relied on the
7 Judgment7~of"t'he in the case of RAJESH
"Q3?-:fiP;:"§*.:4re§orted.§n'*'{2_QQ€a)4 sec 335 and also in the case
"at us:-:A enmennge swnm & omens v. KIRAN APPASO
swnma on-i'e%§=;é.5§Vtreportea in AIR 2007 5:: 1663.
KUMAR AGAR*nfALVVV'AI§Dv"'£:$E'HERS vs. K.K.MOD1 AND
Mr
statement has been filed, the petitioner cannot rely onfthe
decision in support of his case. In the decision 3
of RAISESH KUMAR AGARWAL AND omens \{s¢"'c!§.l<;Vi#iii§ti:r Al
AND OTHERS reported in (2006):: :secl3'e_s'--«i:he
Court while considering the facts involve{i._therein_ set 'V
the order and allowed the app|i¢'a'«tiVon for aroVehd'ine'nt:W'i'she
_ reliance by the learned cou.nsel_«"for'the r§el:ltion'er"wotild not
have any application toLtneV lfieee The other
decision relied unite...jeweleregexz KHAN AhlD
OTHERS vs.' omens reported in
us zoee §ie'r'aloplicatien to the facts
involveclherelri. -
1