Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Jharkhand And Anr. vs Km. Suman And Ors., Pramilla Kumari, ... on 3 March, 2003

State vs . Dinesh & Another on 27 June, 2007

5. Ld. APP for the State has submitted that the case of the prosecution has been proved through the ocular evidence with the State vs. Dinesh & another FIR No.214/00 BR 6 supporting documents and the medical witness to show the cause of death and that the eye witnesses being the colleague labourers and employees of the accused persons have been won over. However, Ld. defence counsel Sh. S. S. Singh has vehemently countered the prosecution case submitting that the public witnesses who were the alleged eye witnesses of the occurrence have not supported the prosecution case and were declared hostile and that the remaining evidence is not sufficient to connect the accused persons with the commission of offence and on this account benefit of doubt be given to the accused persons.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Dinesh Kumar Rawat vs State on 18 September, 2017

Since   there   is   no express provision or prohibition in this regard in the Code of Criminal Procedure, these directions are being issued in exercise of power under Section 482 read with Section 483 Cr.P.C. and Article 227 of the Constitution to secure the   ends   of   justice;   to   avoid   needless   multiplicity   of procedures,   unnecessary   delay   in   trial/protraction   of proceedings;   to   keep   the   path   of   justice   clear   of obstructions and to give effect to the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Bhushan Kumar (supra), Krishna Kumar Variar (supra) and Maneka Gandhi (supra)."
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Mohd. Zaki on 29 April, 2014

(Announced in open (RAKESH KUMAR) Court on 29.04.2014) Addl. Sessions Judge/North East Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (State Vs. Mohd. Zaki) (CA No.12/2013) Page No. 5 of pages 6 CR No.64/2011 State Vs. Suman Kumar @ Pappu & Anr. 29.04.2014 Present: Sh. Dharam Chand, Ld. Addl. PP for State/appellant. Ld. Counsel for respondent. Arguments heard. Put up at 4.00 p.m for orders. (RAKESH KUMAR) ASJ­02 (NE)/KKD/DELHI 29.04.2014 29.04.2014 (at 4.00 p.m.) Present: As before.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Naresh Kumar & Anr. on 4 May, 2007

(Announced in the open court ) (SUNIL GAUR) SPECIAL JUDGE: DELHI 03.05.07 Contd.... 40 CC No. 03/2000 IN THE COURT OF SHRI SUNIL GAUR: SPECIAL JUDGE. DELHI. CC No.3/2000 State Vs Naresh Kumar & Anr. (1) Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Bharat Singh, R/o RZ T-8A, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi. (Lineman, MTNL) (2) Niranjan Singh, S/o Shri Jagat Singh, R/o C-6/57-B, Kesho Puram, Delhi (JTO, MTNL). FIR No.8/1995 Under section 7/13 of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 .
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 23 January, 2020

The present writ petition has been filed for setting aside the effect and operation of the order dated 09.07.2019 passed by the learned Additional District and Session Judge-I, Aligarh in the Criminal Revision No.433 of 2017 (Ram Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others) and vide order dated 02.08.2017 passed by learned A.C.J.M-VI, Aligarh in Criminal Case No.806 of 2017 (State Vs. Prabha Kumari and others), under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Chharra, District Aligarh, by which the discharge application moved by the respondent was allowed and against which the revision was filed, which was also dismissed, hence the present writ petition has been filed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document
1