Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 198 (0.02 seconds)
Documents citing Paban Kumar Gupta @ Pawan Kumar Gupta vs The State Of West Bengal on 1 March, 2022

State vs . Surender Kumar Goyal & Anr. on 19 September, 2022

15. The language of Section 82(2)(i) has to be strictly construed as also the procedure contained therein has to be treated as mandatory and not directory as it is no longer a procedural provision but directly creates liability as an offence. Reliance is also placed upon the decision in Pawan Kumar Gupta vs. The State of West Bengal, (1973) 1 CALLT 300 and Rohit Kumar @ Raju vs. State of NCT Delhi and BSES Rajdhani Power Limited, (2008) 63 AIC 292.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Simran @ Neena on 15 December, 2022

20. The language of Section 82 of the Code has to be strictly construed as also the procedure contained therein has to be treated as mandatory and not directory as it is no longer a procedural provision but directly creates liability as an offence. Reliance is also placed upon the decision in Pawan Kumar Gupta vs. The State of West Bengal, (1973) 1 CALLT 300 and Rohit Kumar @ Raju vs. State of NCT Delhi & BSES Rajdhani Power Limited, (2008) 63 AIC 292.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Simran @ Neena on 15 December, 2022

17. The language of Section 82 of the Code has to be strictly construed as also the procedure contained therein has to be treated as mandatory and not directory as it is no longer a procedural provision but directly creates liability as an offence. Reliance is also placed upon the decision in Pawan Kumar Gupta vs. The State of West Bengal, (1973) 1 CALLT 300 and Rohit Kumar @ Raju vs. State of NCT Delhi & BSES Rajdhani Power Limited, (2008) 63 AIC 292.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Baljit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 18 April, 2023

clauses (a)-(c) in Section 82 (2)(i) of the Cr.P.C. are conjunctive and not disjunctive, which means that there would be no valid publication of the proclamation unless all the three modes of publication are proved. (See Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs. The State of W.B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368). Where the Court so orders a copy of the proclamation has to be additionally published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in which the accused ordinarily resides. Advisably, proclamation has to be issued with four copies so that one each of the three copies of the proclamation may be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which the accused ordinarily resides, to some conspicuous place of such town or village and to some conspicuous part of the Court- house and report regarding publication may be made on the fourth copy of the proclamation. Additional copy will be required where the proclamation is also required to be published in the newspaper.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sarif Muhamed vs State Of Punjab on 27 April, 2023

(See Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs. The State of W.B.: 1973 CriLJ 1368). Where the Court so orders a copy of the proclamation has to be additionally published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in which the accused ordinarily resides. Advisably, proclamation has to be issued with four copies so that one each of the three copies of the proclamation may be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which the accused ordinarily resides, to some conspicuous place of such town or village and to some conspicuous part of the Court- house and report regarding publication may be made on the fourth copy of the proclamation. Additional copy will be required where the proclamation is also required to be published in the newspaper.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sukhchain Chand vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 4 May, 2023

clauses (a)-(c) in Section 82 (2)(i) of the Cr.P.C. are conjunctive and not disjunctive, which means that there would be no valid publication of the proclamation unless all the three modes of publication are proved. (See Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs. The State of W.B.: 1973 CriLJ 1368). Where the Court so orders a copy of the proclamation has to be additionally published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in which the accused ordinarily resides. Advisably, proclamation has to be issued with four copies so that one each of the three copies of the proclamation may be affixed to some conspicuous 5 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 09-05-2023 22:07:48 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:064466 2023:PHHC:064466 CRM-M-6523-2022 (O&M) 6 part of the house or homestead in which the accused ordinarily resides, to some conspicuous place of such town or village and to some conspicuous part of the Court- house and report regarding publication may be made on the fourth copy of the proclamation. Additional copy will be required where the proclamation is also required to be published in the newspaper.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rishi Kapoor vs State Of Haryana And Another on 10 May, 2023

(See Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs. The State of W.B.: 1973 CriLJ 1368). Where the Court so orders a copy of the proclamation has to be additionally published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in which the accused ordinarily resides. Advisably, proclamation has to be issued with four copies so that one each of the three copies of the proclamation may be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which the accused ordinarily resides, to some conspicuous place of such town or village and to some conspicuous part of the Court- house and report regarding publication may be made on the fourth copy of the proclamation.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rishi Kapoor vs State Of Haryana And Another on 10 May, 2023

(See Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs. The State of W.B.: 1973 CriLJ 1368). Where the Court so orders a copy of the proclamation has to be additionally published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in which the accused ordinarily resides. Advisably, proclamation has to be issued with four copies so that one each of the three copies of the proclamation may be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which the accused ordinarily resides, to some conspicuous place of such town or village and to some conspicuous part of the Court- house and report regarding publication may be made on the fourth copy of the proclamation.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sunita on 11 May, 2023

17. The language of Section 82 of the Code has to be strictly construed as also the procedure contained therein has to be treated as mandatory and not directory as it is no longer a procedural provision but directly creates liability as an offence. Reliance is also placed upon the decision in Pawan Kumar Gupta vs. The State of West Bengal, (1973) 1 CALLT 300 and Rohit Kumar @ Raju vs. State of NCT Delhi & BSES Rajdhani Power Limited, (2008) 63 AIC 292.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next