Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (1.53 seconds)
Documents citing Mohan Lal Santwani vs Union Of India And 3 Others on 25 April, 2022

S N Enterprises vs Income Tax Officer & Ors. on 27 September, 2022

26.20.We are in respectful agreement with the law laid down by the various High Courts in Daujee Abhushan (Supra), Santosh Krishna HUF (Supra), Mohan Lal Santwani (Supra), Advance Infradevelopers (P) Ltd. (Supra) and Yuvraj v. Income Tax Officer (Supra), that for determining when Notices were issued, the date and time of when the ITBA e-mail software system is triggered and the Notices leave the last ITBA server would be considered.
Delhi High Court Cites 69 - Cited by 7 - M P Arora - Full Document

Mark Gulati vs Ito Ward 52(1) Delhi & Anr. on 27 September, 2022

26.20.We are in respectful agreement with the law laid down by the various High Courts in Daujee Abhushan (Supra), Santosh Krishna HUF (Supra), Mohan Lal Santwani (Supra), Advance Infradevelopers (P) Ltd. (Supra) and Yuvraj v. Income Tax Officer (Supra), that for determining when Notices were issued, the date and time of when the ITBA e-mail software system is triggered and the Notices leave the last ITBA server would be considered.
Delhi High Court Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document

Krishna Pal Singh vs Union Of India And Others on 19 October, 2022

14. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as ratio of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kishore Samrite (supra), this Court in Mohan Lal Santwali (supra) as well as Promod Kumar Dixit (supra), the impugned order dated 18.11.2005 passed in Original Application No.436 of 1998 (Krishna Pal Singh Vs. Union of India and Others) passed by respondent no.3 i.e. Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad is hereby quashed. The O.A. No.436 of 1998 is restored to its original number. The aforesaid O.A. No.436 of 1998 shall be decided by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, on merit, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - S P Kesarwani - Full Document

Ashish Poddar vs Income Tax Officer Ward 54(1) & Anr. on 27 July, 2022

26.20.We are in respectful agreement with the law laid down by the various High Courts in Daujee Abhushan (Supra), Santosh Krishna HUF (Supra), Mohan Lal Santwani (Supra), Advance Infradevelopers (P) Ltd. (Supra) and Yuvraj v. Income Tax Officer (Supra), that for determining when Notices were issued, the date and time of when the ITBA e-mail software system is triggered and the Notices leave the last ITBA server would be considered.
Delhi High Court Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document

Somnath Virmani vs Dcit Circle 13(1) Delhi And Anr. on 27 July, 2022

26.20.We are in respectful agreement with the law laid down by the various High Courts in Daujee Abhushan (Supra), Santosh Krishna HUF (Supra), Mohan Lal Santwani (Supra), Advance Infradevelopers (P) Ltd. (Supra) and Yuvraj v. Income Tax Officer (Supra), that for determining when Notices were issued, the date and time of when the ITBA e-mail software system is triggered and the Notices leave the last ITBA server would be considered.
Delhi High Court Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document
1   2 3 Next