Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 118 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing Satish Chandra Yadav vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2022

Satish Chandra vs Northern Railway on 19 November, 2025

(emphasis supplied) Page 3 of 4 CAT, Lucknow Bench O.A. No. 332/00481/2023 Satish Chandra Vs. UOI & Ors. 6.2 In the instant case it is not in dispute that the applicant was a Group 'C' employee. It is also not in dispute that the respondents, on review of the applicant's service records, revised his pay with effect from 24.09.2010 and ordered recovery vide the change memo dated 12.10.2023.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Satyendra Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 9 January, 2024

24. This court finds that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Satish Chandra Yadav (supra) has categorically held that if an employee while filling up his application form for appointment on the post has suppressed/concealed the pending criminal case, then it has a clear bearing on the character, conduct and antecedents of the employee and therefore, if it is found that employee has suppressed or given false information in regard to the matters having bearing on his fitness for suitability to the post, his services can be terminated. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further held that that the generalisations about the youth, career prospects and age of the candidate leading to condonation of the offenders' conduct, should not enter into the judicial verdict and should be avoided.
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishan Kumar vs Director General Cisf & Ors. on 13 November, 2024

30. We have read and understood the broad Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 6098/2016 Page 11 of 14 By:NEELAM Signing Date:20.11.2024 15:23:01 principles laid down in Satish Chandra Yadav [Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India, (2023) 7 SCC 536 : (2023) 2 SCC (L&S) 43] with the following crucial paragraph in Avtar Singh [Avtar Singh v. Union of India, (2016) 8 SCC 471 : (2016) 2 SCC (L&S) 425] : (SCC pp. 506-507, para 35) "35. Suppression of "material"
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document

Saurabh Sahai vs State Of U.P. And Others on 27 February, 2025

Hence, even applying the broad principles set out in para 93.7 of Satish Chandra Yadav [Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India, (2023) 7 SCC 536 : (2023) 2 SCC (L&S) 43] , we find that the order of cancellation dated 12-4-2005 is neither fair nor reasonable. Clause 9 of the recruitment notification has to be read in the context of the law laid down in the cases set out hereinabove.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arunkanth vs Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services ... on 1 August, 2023

9.In view of the same and on the basis of the order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court and the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court has also relied upon the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sathish Chandra Yadav Vs. Union of India and others reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 1300 while dealing the batch of writ appeals, this Court is inclined to quash the impugned order, dated 16.05.2023 passed by the third respondent.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jagvinder Singh vs The Secretary, Mha And Ors. on 19 December, 2024

30. We have read and understood the broad principles laid down in Satish Chandra Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 47/2018 Page 13 of 17 By:SUNIL Signing Date:19.12.2024 19:14:30 Yadav [Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India, (2023) 7 SCC 536 : (2023) 2 SCC (L&S) 43] with the following crucial paragraph in Avtar Singh [Avtar Singh v. Union of India, (2016) 8 SCC 471 :
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next