Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (1.14 seconds)

R.Varsha vs Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution on 2 November, 2023

“ 5. The issue as to whether, the respondents are justified in claiming that an application requires to be made within a period of 3 years, when such an applicant is a minor at the relevant point of time, came up for consideration before the Hon'ble Division of this Court in the case of S.Velraj Vs. The Superintendent Engineer and another and the Hon'ble Division Bench, in its order dated 16.12.2015 passed in W.A.No.1400 of 2011, had set aside the order of rejection, by holding that the requirement for making an application by a minor at the relevant point of time, is not justifiable. The relevant portion of the order reads thus:-
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

R.Varsha vs Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution on 2 November, 2023

“ 5. The issue as to whether, the respondents are justified in claiming that an application requires to be made within a period of 3 years, when such an applicant is a minor at the relevant point of time, came up for consideration before the Hon'ble Division of this Court in the case of S.Velraj Vs. The Superintendent Engineer and another and the Hon'ble Division Bench, in its order dated 16.12.2015 passed in W.A.No.1400 of 2011, had set aside the order of rejection, by holding that the requirement for making an application by a minor at the relevant point of time, is not justifiable. The relevant portion of the order reads thus:-
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

C.Easwaran vs The Chief Engineer (General) on 28 November, 2024

ii) In S.Velraj vs. The Superintendent Engineer and another in W.A.(MD).No.1400 of 2011, a Division Bench of this Court vide its judgment dated 16.12.2015 held that three years limitation cannot be 9/28 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1288 of 2018 applied in strait-jacket formula and each and every case has to be approached differently, based on the facts. The relevant paragraph is extracted hereunder:
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

C.Easwaran vs The Chief Engineer (General) on 28 November, 2024

ii) In S.Velraj vs. The Superintendent Engineer and another in W.A.(MD).No.1400 of 2011, a Division Bench of this Court vide its 9/27 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1288 of 2018 judgment dated 16.12.2015 held that three years limitation cannot be applied in strait-jacket formula and each and every case has to be approached differently, based on the facts. The relevant paragraph is extracted hereunder:
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document
1   2 Next