Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.85 seconds)

Smt. Sovana Dey vs Sri. Tapaban Dey on 10 August, 2022

23. I am of the considered view that since coordinate Benches of this Court in Smt. Kamala Rani Roy & Ors. v. Sri Sambhu Sen & Ors. (supra) and Golam Kibria Mallik v. Sk. amar ali & ors (supra), took one view and subsequently a coordinate bench took a different view and referred the matter to a larger bench, judicial discipline requires that I follow the earlier view which still holds the field and has not yet been differed from by a larger bench.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - A Banerjee - Full Document

Sk. Abdul Odud Ali vs Emanulla Khan And Others on 16 July, 2021

36. However, judicial decorum demands that I stop short of allowing the instant application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, thereby setting aside the order impugned herein, since my view, with utmost humility, is contrary to the interpretation of Barasat Eye Hospital (supra) by two previous co-ordinate Benches, in C.O. No. 2461 of 2007 (Smt. Kamala Rani Roy & Ors. vs. Sri Sambhu Sen & Ors.), and C.O. No. 2311 of 2006 (Golam Kibria Mallik vs. Sk. Amir Ali & Ors.).
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 12 - Cited by 7 - S Bhattacharyya - Full Document

Sk. Abdul Odud Ali vs Emanulla Khan And Others on 14 July, 2021

Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party nos. 1 and 2- preemptees cites two unreported judgments respectively passed by other co-ordinate Benches of this Court in C. O. No. 2461 of 2007 (Smt. Kamala Rani Roy & Ors. Vs. Sri Sambhu Sen & Ors.) and C. O. No. 2311 of 2006 (Golam Kibria Mallik Vs. Sk. Amir Ali & Ors.). In the first of the above judgements, a specific objection in tune with the objection taken by the petitioner in the present case was raised, but such question was decided in the negative by the co-ordinate Bench.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1