Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.23 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs M/S Anoj Kumar Agrawal Engineers And ... on 6 May, 2015

State vs Mangal on 29 February, 2024

IO had not prepared the returning memo of seal. IO had not inquired about the source of illicit liquor from where accused obtained the same. IO did not join any independent witness in the investigation. IO brought State Vs Mangal FIR No. 703/20 PS Vikas Puri U/S 33/38 Delhi Excise Act. 3 plastic kattas from the nearby shop. He cannot tell from where be brought the same. He returned the seal at about 3:00 pm. The information regarding arrest of accused was given to his wife and she came to the spot. The signature of the wife of accused was taken by the IO.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Mangal Singh on 20 September, 2023

19. Further, as per evidence on record, the seal after use was not given to any independent public person but was infact given to PW-1, who was also a material prosecution witness being a witness to the alleged recovery of the illicit liquor from the possession of the accused, such material witness of a case is always interested in State vs. Mangal Singh FIR no.39/2020 PS Raj Park Page No. 9/11 Digitally by DEEPALI signed SRIVASTAVA DEEPALI SRIVASTAVA Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mishri Lal vs State Of U.P. And Another on 4 December, 2021

2. The present criminal revision has been filed seeking to set aside the judgement and order dated 17.11.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Mainpuri in Session Trial No. 316 of 2014 (State vs. Anoj Kumar), under Sections 307, 504 I.P.C., Police Station-Kishni, District-Mainpuri, arising out of Case Crime No. 266 of 2014, on the application of the opposite party no.2 filed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Y K Srivastava - Full Document
1   2 Next