Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (1.31 seconds)

M K Lohithakshan vs D/O Post on 9 August, 2018

6. Respondents have cited the judgement of Allahabad High Court in the case of Union of India and Ors vs. Rajesh Kumar Singh and Anr. In Writ A No. 39425 of 2006 dated 31.3.2014 in which it is held that Rule 132 of the Postal Manual provides for penalties for neglect of duty, which provides that if a Postman is found guilty of habitually loitering on his beat, or employing the agency of unauthorised person, or persons unconnected with the Post Office to deliver articles entrusted to him for delivery, or otherwise neglecting his duty, he would be liable to removal or prosecution in a court 4 OA No. 180/1131/2014 of law under the Post Office Act.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1