Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 71 (2.70 seconds)

Manoj Pratap Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 24 June, 2022

We may also observe that the theory of ‘residual doubt’ was previously suggested before us in the case of Pappu (supra) but, in that case, it was not considered necessary to dilate much on this aspect because a strong case for commuting death sentence into that of imprisonment for life was nevertheless made out with the mitigating factors of probability of reformation and rehabilitation of the convict and his satisfactory jail conduct. However, we had indicated, with reference to 19 Vide paragraphs 76 to 76.4 of the said decision in Shatrughna Baban Meshram.
Supreme Court of India Cites 84 - Cited by 288 - D Maheshwari - Full Document

Md. Anowar Hussain vs State Of Assam on 13 October, 2022

11. As noticed, the Trial Court and the High Court have concurrently recorded the findings in this case that the prosecution has been able to successfully establish the chain of circumstances leading to the only conclusion that the appellant is guilty of the offence of murder of his wife. The concurrent findings leading to the appellant’s conviction have been 29 challenged in this appeal as if inviting re-appreciation of entire evidence on its contents as also its surrounding factors. Though the parameters of examining the matters in an appeal by special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India have been laid down repeatedly by this Court in several of the decisions but, having regard to the submissions made in this case, we usefully reiterate the observations in the case of Pappu v. The State of Uttar Pradesh: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 176 wherein, after referring to Articles 134 and 136 of the Constitution of India and Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 as also with a detailed reference to the relevant decisions, this Court has summed up the subtle distinction in the scope of a regular appeal and an appeal by special leave in the following words: -
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 3 - D Maheshwari - Full Document

Ram Guru vs State on 14 November, 2022

21. The same has been reiterated in multiple judgments of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the cases of Sham Singh v. State of Haryana8, Vijay @ Chinee v. State of Madhya Pradesh9, Mukesh & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.10, State represented by Inspector of Police v. Saravanan & Anr.11, State of Himachal Pradesh v. Manga Singh12 and in the recent judgment of Pappu v. State of Uttar Pradesh13.
Delhi High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Arvind Kumar @ Raj Singhania vs The State Of Bihar on 19 October, 2022

73. To this Court, it appears that this case cannot be equated with the cases where there is kidnapping, rape and murder Patna High Court D. REF. No.3 of 2021 dt.19-10-2022 47/48 of victim. It has been submitted that in the case of Pappu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2022(2) BLJ 231(SC) which was case of rape and murder of a child sentence of death was commuted to life imprisonment.
Patna High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - R R Prasad - Full Document

Abhishek Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 19 October, 2022

73. To this Court, it appears that this case cannot be equated with the cases where there is kidnapping, rape and murder Patna High Court D. REF. No.3 of 2021 dt.19-10-2022 47/48 of victim. It has been submitted that in the case of Pappu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2022(2) BLJ 231(SC) which was case of rape and murder of a child sentence of death was commuted to life imprisonment.
Patna High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - R R Prasad - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next