Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.80 seconds)

Brijmohan Verma vs Managing Director And 3 Others on 1 April, 2022

However, insofar as the arrears of 6th Pay Commission and consequential benefits of revised pension are concerned, the matter is already engaging attention before the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. and another v. Kamesh Srivastava and others in SLP (Civil) No.- 5311 of 2022 and, therefore, any consideration can be made after decision of the Supreme Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Bhaiya Lal vs Managing Director U P Jal Nigam And 3 ... on 8 April, 2022

However, insofar as the arrears of 6th Pay Commission and consequential benefits of revised pension are concerned, the matter is already engaging attention before the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. and another v. Kamesh Srivastava and others in SLP (Civil) No.- 5311 of 2022 and, therefore, any consideration can be made after decision of the Supreme Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Satya Narayan Singh vs Managing Director, U P Jal Nigam And 3 ... on 12 April, 2022

However, insofar as the arrears of 6th Pay Commission and consequential benefits of revised pension are concerned, the matter is already engaging attention before the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. and another v. Kamesh Srivastava and others in SLP (Civil) No.- 5311 of 2022 and, therefore, any consideration can be made after decision of the Supreme Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Kamesh vs State Of U.P. on 7 November, 2023

As this appeal arises out of impugned judgement and order dated 24.10.2019 passed by Sessions Judge, Hapur in Session Trial No. 167 of 2016 (State vs. Kamesh), arising out of Case Crime no. 158 of 2015, under Sections 302/34 IPC, P.S. Bahadurgarh, District Hapur, convicting the appellant under Section 302/34 IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 50,000/-; the bail application of the appellant is being disposed of by this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kamlesh Srivastava And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 4 May, 2026

2. The instant criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been filed by the appellants to set aside the proceeding of Case No.433 of 2025 (State versus Kamlesh Srivastava and others) as well as charge-sheet no. 103 of 2025 dated 5.8.2025 and cognizance order dated 19.12.2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 92 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S. and Section 3(1)Dha, 3(2)(va) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Mahewaghat, District Kaushambi, pending in the court of Additional District Judge/Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kaushambi.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

U.P Jal Nigam (Rural) Thru. Its Chairman ... vs Mohammad Waseem Iqbal And 3 Others on 30 May, 2022

Accordingly, we dispose of this special appeal by providing that the judgment of learned Single Judge shall stand modified in terms of the order dated 20-05-2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. and another Vs. Kamesh Srivastava and others, Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 3311 of 2022.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - D K Upadhyaya - Full Document
1   2 3 Next