Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 171 (1.21 seconds)
Documents citing Binod Bihari Singh vs Union Of India on 8 December, 1992

Municipal Corporation Of Ahmedabad ... vs Voltas Limited And Etc. Etc. on 6 May, 1994

In Binod Bihari Singh's case (AIR 1993 SC 1245) there was delay in the appellant filing the arbitration award in Court. To seek the condonation, the appellant had sought to make positive case that he had filed application within three weeks from the date of receipt of the award. On the evidence before the, Court, the High Court disbelieved that evidence and it was held that delay could not be condoned on the ground that the appellant was misled by the provisions of the old limitation Act.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 45 - Full Document

Housing Board, Haryana And Anr vs M/S Comfits Marketing And Ors on 13 August, 2019

The decisions rendered in the case of Binod Bihari Singh vs. Union of India (supra) was subsequently followed by the Supreme Court in the case of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Essar Oil Limited (supra). So, it is clear that if the plea of limitation is not raised by a party in the arbitration petition or in the written statement, even then plea of limitation can be considered by the court while deciding a petition under Section 34 of the Act.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - J Thakur - Full Document

P.Ayyasamy vs B.Mohammed Yousuff on 16 August, 2013

".12..There is no doubt whatsoever in our mind that the respondent made totally incorrect statement in the application filed in the High Court. We express our reservation as to the manner in which a public authority conducted itself in its anxiety to somehow get the relief from the Court. In our considered opinion, incorrect statement made in the application seeking condonation of delay itself is sufficient to reject the application without any further inquiry as to whether the averments made in the application reveal sufficient cause to condone the delay. That a party taking a false stand to get rid of the bar of limitation should not be encouraged to get any premium on the falsehood on its part by condoning delay. (See Binod Bihari Singh v. Union of India, (1993) 1 SCC 572."
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - K R Baabu - Full Document

M S Agilus Diagnostics Limited Formerly ... vs M S Teresa Diagnostics Centre Through ... on 6 April, 2026

The decisions rendered in the case of Binod Bihari Singh versus Union of India (supra) was subsequently followed by the Supreme Court in the case of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. versus Essar Oil Limited (supra). So, it is clear that if the plea of limitation is not raised by a party in the arbitration petition or in the written statement, even then plea of limitation can be considered by the court while deciding a petition under Section 34 of the Act."
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next