Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing National Insurance Company vs Jayashreeben Nandulal Nerkar (Patil) ... on 6 May, 2008

M/S Hadiso Construction Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Commissioner Employees Compensation & ... on 21 December, 2017

6. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the time of the hearing that respondent No.2 is the principal employer and should be held equally liable to pay the compensation. It is further submitted that the interest should be awarded from the date of the order instead of the date of the accident. Reliance is placed on National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mubasir Ahmed, (2007) 2 SCC 349 and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jayashreeben Nandulal Nerkar Patil, 2011 (2) T.A.C. 237 (Guj.). It is further submitted FAO 85/2016 Page 3 of 16 that there is a calculation mistake in the computation of the interest by the Commissioner and excess interest amount of Rs.12,798/- has been paid by appellant No.1.
Delhi High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - J R Midha - Full Document

Zubedaben Usmangani Champaneriya & 3 vs Mohammedbhai Musabhai Shaikh & on 9 January, 2014

1. Mr. V. A. Mansuri, learned advocate for the appellants has drawn the attention of the Court to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Shrinivas Sabata and another, AIR 1976 SC 222 as well as the decision of this Court in the case of National Insurance Company v. Jayashreeben Nandulal Nerkar (Patil) and others, 2008 (3) GLR 2004, to submit that the Tribunal was not justified in denying payment of penalty to the appellants as well as in awarding interest from the date of registration of the application under the Workmen's Compensation Act instead of awarding interest from the date of accident.
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - H Devani - Full Document
1