Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.54 seconds)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Lalita Sharma And Ors. on 1 July, 2005

20. In addition to this oral evidence the parties have also placed on record a number of documents. The relevant documents are Ext. PW-1-A, a copy of a partnership deed in which deceased Ashish Sharma is shown to be a partner in one firm known as M/s. Mahajan Agency, Shahpur, District Kangra. Ext. PW-1/E to PW-1/S are various certificates showing that the deceased was a good athlete and used to regularly take part in extra-curricular activities. Ext. R-1 is the copy of the judgment delivered by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solan in case State v. Hem Chand Sharma. This case was filed on the complaint of Alice under Sections 384, 494, 341, 506, 498-A, 420, 468 and 323, I.P.C. This complaint was dismissed on 27th October, 1987.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - D Gupta - Full Document

Hira Lal vs Dda & Ors on 18 July, 2012

The application does not refer to even one document that is sought to be proved by secondary evidence. There is only one mention in the application that the defendant wants to lead secondary evidence regarding documents relating to 'proceedings under PP Act'. It is well settled that an application under Section 65 Indian Evidence Act must be absolutely clear and accompanied with proper affidavit. I rely on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Khem Raj cited at AIR 2000 SC 1759 on this point.
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1