Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.35 seconds)
Documents citing Chanan Mal Newar And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 15 October, 1976

Kartar Kaur vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 15 December, 1984

All what it does is, it re-hears the cause as it was in the Court of the first instance. There is no vacuum to fill, for it is a continuous process till the proceedings come to finality. The view of the Financial Commissioner equally has no legal basis that factually proceedings must be pending immediately before the commencement of the Act, for, proceedings in contemplation in exercise of the rights conferred under the law, are also within the compass of that expression. I am in respectful agreement with the view expressed by R. N. Mittal, J. in Chanan Mal Newar's case, (AIR 1977 Punj & Har 34) (supra) and by I. S. Tiwana, J. in Ishar Singh's case, (AIR 1981 NOC 182) (supra) for the foregoing discussion.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - M M Punchhi - Full Document

Ambica Parshad And Ors vs Financial Commissioner And Ors on 24 December, 2014

In Chanan Mal Newar and others Vs. State of Haryana and others 1977 PLJ 81 raising an issue of when the proceedings for determination of surplus area are pending under Section 33(2)(ii) under the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972, the Court held that if the litigant could take any proceedings in any case such proceeding will be considered to be pending. To our benefit, the interpretation must be the competency of the tenant to pay the balance without any fetter being placed under the Act itself must result in a situation of the proceedings to be pending to enable to the tenant to secure the full benefit of a compromise.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - K Kannan - Full Document
1