M/S V Care Health Services Ltd vs Chandigarh Administration And Ors on 4 November, 2014
Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that
the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the entire outstanding
amount and that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause in not
depositing the amount payable to the Administration. Reference is
made to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported as Teri
Oat Estates (P) Ltd. v. U.T. Chandigarh & Ors, 2004 (2) SCC 130;
judgment of Full Bench of this Court in Dheera Singh v. U.T.
Chandigarh Admn., ILR (2013) 1 P&H 217, and Division Bench
judgment of this Court in CWP No.12159 of 1995 titled Jagjit Singh
v. Union Territory, Chandigarh and others, decided on 01.10.2014.