Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 65 (2.79 seconds)

Dharam Pal vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 12 July, 2019

e) In Narcotics Control Bureau v Dilip Pralhad Namade, 2004 (3) SCC 619, Supreme Court observed, "10. The limitations on granting of bail come in only when the question of granting bail arises on merits. Apart from the grant of opportunity to the public prosecutor, the other twin conditions which really have relevance so far the present accused-respondent is concerned, are (1) the satisfaction of the Court that there are reasonable grounds ::: Downloaded on - 29/09/2019 00:43:53 :::HCHP for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The conditions are cumulative and not .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Kelsi Katte Mahammed Shakir vs The Superintendent Of Customs on 26 September, 2018

15. It is his contention that Section 37 of N.D.P.S. Act is in addition to Section 439 of Cr.P.C. and Section 37 imposes limitation on granting of bail in addition to those provided under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. In this behalf, the learned CGSC for the respondent has relied upon the decision in the case of NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU v. 17 DILIP PRALHAD NAMADE reported in (2004)3 SCC 619 at para Nos. 8, 9 and 10 which reads as under:-
Karnataka High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Nittin Johari vs Serious Fraud Investigation Office on 27 January, 2020

b. Bijando Singh v. Md. Ibocha (2004) 10 SCC 15; c. Union of India v. Rattan Mallik @ Habul-(2009) 2 SCC 624; d. Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kishan Lal ( 1991) 1SCC 705; e. Customs New Delhi v. Ahmadalieva Nadira 2004 3 SCC 549; f. Union of India v. Shiv Shankar Kesari-(2007) 7 SCC 798; g. Satpal Singh vs. state of Punjab ( 2018) 13 SCC 813; h. Narcotics Control Bureau v. Dilip Pralhad Namade (2004) 2 SCC 619;
Delhi High Court Cites 53 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next