Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Emperor vs Khiali on 3 January, 1917

In Re: Putta Ranganayakulu And Ors. vs Unknown on 1 September, 1955

43. The Allahabad High Court in Emperor v, Khiali, 1922 All 480 (AIR V 9) (M) expressed the same view as the Madras High Court. There, a petition of appeal was submitted through the Superintendent of the jail and it was rejected by a Judge of that Court. The learned Judges rejected the regular appeal filed by the same accused on the ground that it was not open to the appellant to present a second petition of appeal. The reason for the conclusion is stated at page 481 as follows:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - K S Rao - Full Document

Bindhyachal Ahir vs State Of Bihar on 16 September, 1957

In laying down these propositions their Lordships followed the decisions in Emperor v. Khiali, ILR 44 All 759 : (AIR 1922 All 480) (B); Kunhahamad Haji v. Emperor, ILR 46 Mad 382 : (AIR 1923 Mad 426) (C); Lachmi Singh v. Bhusi Singh, 43 Ind Cas 817 : (AIR 1917 Pat 110) (D); Gajo Chaudhry v. Debi Chaudhury, 72 Ind Cas 945 : (AIR 1923 Pat 532) (E); Nand Kishore Lal v. Emperor, 51 Ind Cas 271 : (AIR 1919 Pat 514) (F); Kuldip Das v. Emperor, ILR 11 Pat 697 : (AIR 1933 Pat 38) (G).
Patna High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1