Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 371 (2.61 seconds)

Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd. Meerut vs Lakshmi Chand And Ors on 16 July, 2015

40/ In view of observations of the apex Court in Central Bank of India  Appellant versus State of Kerala and others  respondents and Union of India versus Delhi High Court Bar Association cases, these writ petitions would require to be dismissed, but regard being had to the special constitutional and legal position occupied by the State of J&K in the community of States of Union of India and in view of the constitutional and legal issues raised by learned counsel about the same, the applicability of some of the provisions of the Act of 2002, more particularly, section 13(1) and (4) thereof, has come under cloud. The issues raised at bar would require to be considered from this stand point now.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 92 - Cited by 21 - Full Document

Ratan Lal Acharya vs M/O Finance on 24 September, 2018

15. It is very clear that the person who slept over his rights and for the grievance of 2012 has approached this Tribunal only in 2016 cannot seek similar benefits as those persons who have already raised their grievance at much earlier stage, and therefore, question of stating that they are similarly placed as that of Abdul Kadir & Ors. (supra), this cannot be a ground to get identical relief as held by the Apex Court in several judgments i.e. (i) (2015) 1 SCC 347 in the case of State of UP Vs. Arvind Kumar Srivasthava & Ors. (ii) (2009) 2 SCC 479 in the case of S.S. Balu & Anr. Vs. State of Kerala & Ors. and (iii) (2007) 2 SCC 725 in the case of A.P. Steel Re-rolling Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala & Ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next