Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.93 seconds)
Documents citing English Medium Students Parents Assn vs State Of Karnataka on 8 December, 1993

State Of Karnataka vs Asstd.Mang.Of Gov.Rec.Prim.& ... on 6 May, 2014

20. Mr. Katarki submitted that the reliance placed by the State on the decision of this Court in English Medium Students Parents Association v. State of Karnataka & Ors. (supra) in which the earlier Government Order dated 22.06.1989 prescribing mother tongue as the medium of instruction was upheld is misplaced as the reason given by this Court in the aforesaid decision for upholding the order dated 22.06.1989 25 of the State Government is that the order did not have an element of compulsion.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - A K Patnaik - Full Document

State Of Karnataka & Anr vs Asstd.Mang.Of Gov.Rec.Prim.& ... on 6 May, 2014

20. Mr. Katarki submitted that the reliance placed by the State on the decision of this Court in English Medium Students Parents Association v. State of Karnataka & Ors. (supra) in which the earlier Government Order dated 22.06.1989 prescribing mother tongue as the medium of instruction was upheld is misplaced as the reason given by this Court in the aforesaid decision for upholding the order dated 22.06.1989 of the State Government is that the order did not have an element of compulsion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 1 - A K Patnaik - Full Document

Tamil Nadu Tamil & English Schools ... vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Its ... on 20 April, 2000

90. Secondly we directed the Registry to get a copy of the writ petition filed in WP No.536 of 1991 (in that case before the Apex Court). The Registry placed before us a copy of the same received by it from the Supreme Court. We perused the same very carefully and we are completely satisfied that the writ petitioner did not raise any around/point touching the medium of instruction. Rightly so since as already mentioned by the impugned G.O. no institution was directed to introduce the medium of instruction in mother tongue and nobody was directed to study the subjects in the mother tongue. This is further clear from the fact that if a person was aggrieved even by asking him to study Kannada language, he would have been more aggrieved, if he was asked to study in Kannada Medium and certainly that would have been the very first and main ground in the writ Petition.
Madras High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 12 - N Dhinakar - Full Document

Lalit Kumar Dixit And Anr. vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ... on 19 December, 2003

The policy decision of the State Government in respect of imparting condensed training of B.T.C. only those candidates, who were covered under the said Government Order dated 9.1.1998 and the policy decision of the State Government was not said to be interferred with when challenged in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in a case of English Medium Students Parents Association v. State of Karnataka and Ors., (1994) 1 SCC 550. The Court also approved the restrictions imposed by the Government Order dated 9.1.1998, which only allowed the degree holders of the State of Uttar Pradesh and such restrictions imposed by the said Government Order was said to be not violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - R B Misra - Full Document

Dr. Amaresh Kumar vs Lakshmibai National College Of ... on 1 July, 1996

9. A question pertaining to notification by the Karnataka Government in respect of language policy came before Supreme Court for consideration where it was made compulsory to study regional language of the State. English Medium Students Parents Association challenged the act of Karnataka Gov-ernment. The case was finely adjudicated by the Supreme Court in the case of English Medium Students Parents Association v. State of Karnataka, reported in AIR 1994 SC 1702. The Supreme Court considering the import of Article 35A held that the facilities for instruction in mother tongue at primary stage should be endeavoured of every State and by every local authority within the State to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage of education to children. This Article was designed to implement one of the States Reorganisation Commission's important recommendations regarding safeguards for linguistic minorities in the States after reorganisation.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Juhu Parle Education Society And Others vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 22 April, 1994

The second decision English Medium "Students Parents Association "v. State of Karnataka, is very instructive. The Supreme Court while examining the rights of linguistic minority and medium of instructions of schools observed that all educational experts are uniformly of the opinion that pupils should begin their schooling through the medium of their mother-tongue. Where the tender minds of the children are subject to an alien medium the learning process becomes unnatural and inflicts a cruel strain on the children which makes the entire transaction mechanical. The Supreme Court observed that the basic knowledge can easily be garnered through the mother-tongue and when the pupil comes to the age, the second language can be introduced. The Supreme Court while examining the Government order issued by the State of Karnataka in regard to the introduction of Kannada as the first language observed that it should be the endeavour of every State to promote the regional language of the State and the Government of Karnataka has done com-mendably well in passing the Government order. It was further observed that the State knows how best to implement the language policy and when such policy is to bring about academic discipline as a regulatory measure, the Court should decline to interfere.
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajendra Prasad Maitri vs Pradhan Singh & Ors. Reported In (1995) on 21 February, 2005

12. Shri Prashant Mishra, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State, in support of the contention relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of English Medium Students Parents Association vs. State of Karnataka and others reported in AIR 1994 SC 1702 (Paras 18 to 26) and contended that Article 350 and 350-A of the Constitution coupled with the object of the Serva Shiksha Abhiyan have to be read in. It is contended that 22249 teachers are to be appointed. Learned counsel further contended that the validity is to be presumed unless contrary is shown. Reliance is placed upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case In re The Kerala Education Bill, 1957 reported in AIR 1958 SC 956. Reliance is also placed upon the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of ITC Ltd. & ors. vs. State of Karnataka reported in 1985 (Supp) SCC 476 and In re Special Courts Bill, 1978 reported in AIR 1979 SC 478.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next