Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.68 seconds)
Documents citing Omanakkuttan vs The State Of Kerala on 20 November, 2020

Gopal Dass And Others vs State Of U.P. on 21 April, 2023

and Omanakkuttan and others vs. State of Kerala, 2021 (115) ACC 747, that the appellants are on bail for the last 33 years and they have not misused the liberty of bail during the said period, this Court is of the view that if the sentence awarded is reduced to the period already undergone and a reasonable compensation is awarded to the victim, the ends of justice would be served.
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lankaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2023

NC: 2023:KHC:42788 CRL.RP No. 476 of 2016 circumstances it was held that the offence punishable under Section 326 is made out. The learned High Court Government Pleader lastly relied on another judgment of First Appellate Court in Omanakkuttan and others Vs. State of Kerala in Crl.A.No.800/2020, wherein only the appeal was admitted for hearing on the quantum of sentence not on merits of the case. The Hon'ble Apex Court after hearing both sides and in view of the facts of the said case has modified the sentence for the offence punishable under Section 326 of IPC.
Karnataka High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rama Rao Nagesh Babu, Spsr Nellore Dt., vs The State Of Ap., Rep Pp., on 24 July, 2025

31. Learned counsel for A.2 has sought a modification of the sentence, contending that further incarceration would be excessive and unjust, given that the accused had already served a significant portion of the sentence. The learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the decision in Omanakkuttan V. State of Kerala 4 , wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court reduced the sentence awarded to accused punished for offences under section 308 and 326 IPC for the period already undergone.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M. Bhaskar Naidu, vs The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd., on 1 September, 2025

20. Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused has sought a modification of the sentence, contending that further incarceration would be excessive and unjust, given that the accused had already served a significant portion of the sentence. The learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the decision in Omanakkuttan V. State of Kerala4, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court reduced the sentence awarded to accused punished for offences under section 308 and 326 IPC for the period already undergone.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narasimha Murthy Gopi vs The State Of A.P. on 3 September, 2025

20. Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused has sought a modification of the sentence, contending that further incarceration would be excessive and unjust, given that the accused had already served a significant portion of the sentence. The learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the decision in Omanakkuttan V. State of Kerala4, wherein the Hon‟ble Supreme Court reduced the sentence awarded to the accused punished for offences under section 308 and 326 IPC for the period already undergone.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bandi Sai Baba, vs The State Of A.P. Rep., By Its Pp. on 3 September, 2025

20. Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused has sought a modification of the sentence, contending that further incarceration would be excessive and unjust, given that the accused had already served a significant portion of the sentence. The learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the decision in Omanakkuttan V. State of Kerala4, wherein the Hon‟ble Supreme 4 (2021) 12 SCC 92 7 Court reduced the sentence awarded to the accused punished for offences under section 308 and 326 IPC for the period already undergone.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Konuku Pradeep Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep Pp on 7 January, 2026

21. Learned counsel for the petitioner/A.1 has sought a modification of the sentence, contending that further incarceration would be excessive and unjust, given that the accused had already served a significant portion of the sentence. The learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the decision in Omanakkuttan V. State of Kerala4, wherein the Hon‟ble Supreme Court reduced the sentence awarded to the accused punished for offences under section 308 and 326 IPC for the period already undergone.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1