Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 271 (5.40 seconds)Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Bhushan Dua, New Delhi on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd., ... on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.
Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd,New ... vs Dcit Central Circle-3, Delhi on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Bhushan Dua, Delhi on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.
Super Cassettes Industries Private ... vs Dcit Central Circle 03, Delhi on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central ... vs Bhushan Dua, Delhi on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central ... vs Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd., ... on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central ... vs Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd., ... on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central ... vs Bhushan Dua, Delhi on 25 September, 2025
In the absence of any evidence and in light of the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Calcutta Agency Ltd. 19 ITR
191 wherein it was held that the onus of proving necessary facts in order to
avail the deduction u/s.37(1) is on the assessee, If the assessee fails to
establish the facts necessary to support his claim for deduction, the claim
for deduction is not admissible.