Raghubir Sahai Bhatnagar vs Bhakt Sajjan on 28 October, 1977
The facts of the instant case are quite similar to those involved in Nathu Ram's case.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (1.74 seconds)Documents citing
Nathu Ram vs Salim Abdul Karim on 15 December, 1932
S.P. Srivastava vs Smt. Prem Lata Srivastava on 11 March, 1980
Reference was also made to the single Judge decision in the case of Nathu Ram v. Salim Abdul Karim (AIR 1933 All 165), where Iqbal Ahmad, J. held that failure to effect service by affixation of a copy of the summons on the door of the defendant's residence was a mere irregularity in the service of summons and simply because of the irregularity the defendant was not entitled to have the ex parte decree set aside.
Ganeshmal Bhawarlal vs Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd. on 2 January, 1951
No doubt the latter contention is supported by the decisions in 'Nathu v. Salim 1933 All L J 165, and 'Teja Singh v. Jeswant Singh AIR (22) 1935 Lah 171 but I respectfully disagree with the these decisions.
Dundbahadur Singh And Ors. vs Durga Prasad Singh And Ors. on 23 January, 1953
In -- 'Nathu Ram v. Salim Abdul Karim', AIR 1933 All 165 (O), it is not clear whether the defendant retained the copy of the summons which was delivered to him. Even if it be so, the case is no authority in view of the decision of the Division Bench in the case of --'AIR 1924 Pat 44S (L)'.
The Code Of Civil Procedure,1908
"One decision taking such view is Nathu Ram v. Saiim Abdul Karim,
A.I.R. 1933 All. 165 (Iqbal Ahmad L).
Salazar Luis Anthony Marques (Since ... vs Mohd. Haroon Japanwala & Ors. on 1 October, 2014
The
High Court of Allahabad in Nathu Ram v. Salim Abdul Karim13
12
AIR (1955) SC 425
13
AIR 1933AII 165
RC. REV 374 of 2013 Page 28 of 31
while addressing the issue of service of summons under the Code of
Civil Procedure noted:
1