Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.41 seconds)

Shri Sunil Kumar Singha vs . State Of Meghalaya & Ors. on 22 August, 2022

In support of his contention, the learned counsel has cited the case of Pravin Rana v. State of Karnataka: 2019 SCC Online Kar 3067 and also the case of Dilip Jana v. State of West Bengal: 2009 SCC Online Cal 1569 where, in similarly situated cases as the instant case, the Hon'ble High Court reading into the provisions of Section 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, vis-a-vis the fact that the accused therein was found to be a customer of prostitution and in the case of Dilip Jana (supra), where the accused was caught red-handed by the police in the presence of independent witnesses from a hotel, while he was carrying on prostitution, 3 the Court found that no offence under Section 3, 4, 5 & 6 has been made out against the petitioner therein.
Meghalaya High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - W Diengdoh - Full Document

E. Jitender Reddy vs The State Of Telangana on 30 June, 2025

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the materials placed by the prosecution, and the allegations made, even if taken at face value, do not constitute any offence against the petitioner. He submits that, as per the averments, the petitioner was found within the premises but not in the company of the victim. Furthermore, the alleged offence does not make out a prima facie case against the petitioner for trial. Therefore, the continuation of proceedings against the petitioner would amount to an abuse of the process of law. He further placed reliance on the judgments of this Court in Dr.Billakanti Venkatesh v. State of Telangana 1 and Dilip Jana Vs. State of West Bengal 2.
Telangana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - N Tukaramji - Full Document
1