Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.69 seconds)
Documents citing N.Rajagopal vs Tvs Motor Company Limited on 30 March, 2021

M/S. New Natural Coco vs S.Eliyas on 21 December, 2021

5. On this issue, the respondent also relies upon the judgment of this Court in N.Rajagopal, Proprietor v. Motor Co. (2021) 5 CTC 187, wherein this Court referred to several judgments as to what constitutes a dispute and held that the existence of a dispute is an essential pre-requisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by an arbitral tribunal. On the facts of that case, the Court Page No.4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Comm.Div.) No.159 of 2021 concluded that the arbitral proceedings were without jurisdiction in the absence of a dispute.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Ramamoorthy - Full Document

M/S. New Natural Fibre vs S.Eliyas on 21 December, 2021

5. On this issue, the respondent also relies upon the judgment of this Court in N.Rajagopal, Proprietor v. Motor Co. (2021) 5 CTC 187, wherein this Court referred to several judgments as to what constitutes a dispute and held that the existence of a dispute is an essential pre-requisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by an arbitral tribunal. On the facts of that case, the Court Page No.4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Comm.Div.) No.157 of 2021 concluded that the arbitral proceedings were without jurisdiction in the absence of a dispute.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Ramamoorthy - Full Document

M/S. New Natural Fibre vs S.Eliyas on 21 December, 2021

5. On this issue, the respondent also relies upon the judgment of this Court in N.Rajagopal, Proprietor v. Motor Co. (2021) 5 CTC 187, wherein this Court referred to several judgments as to what constitutes a dispute and held that the existence of a dispute is an essential pre-requisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by an arbitral tribunal. On the facts of that case, the Court Page No.4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Comm.Div.) No.157 of 2021 concluded that the arbitral proceedings were without jurisdiction in the absence of a dispute.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Ramamoorthy - Full Document

M/S. New Natural Fibre vs S.Eliyas on 21 December, 2021

5. On this issue, the respondent also relies upon the judgment of this Court in N.Rajagopal, Proprietor v. Motor Co. (2021) 5 CTC 187, wherein this Court referred to several judgments as to what constitutes a dispute and held that the existence of a dispute is an essential pre-requisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by an arbitral tribunal. On the facts of that case, the Court Page No.4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Comm.Div.) No.157 of 2021 concluded that the arbitral proceedings were without jurisdiction in the absence of a dispute.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Ramamoorthy - Full Document

M/S. New Natural Fibre vs S.Eliyas on 21 December, 2021

5. On this issue, the respondent also relies upon the judgment of this Court in N.Rajagopal, Proprietor v. Motor Co. (2021) 5 CTC 187, wherein this Court referred to several judgments as to what constitutes a dispute and held that the existence of a dispute is an essential pre-requisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by an arbitral tribunal. On the facts of that case, the Court Page No.4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Comm.Div.) No.157 of 2021 concluded that the arbitral proceedings were without jurisdiction in the absence of a dispute.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Ramamoorthy - Full Document
1