Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.33 seconds)

Vedanta Ltd vs Jodhpur 1 on 27 November, 2019

18. No doubt delivery through speed post in ordinary course be presumed to have been complied with the provisions of Section 37C of CEA, 1944 ,unless the speed post returned back by the postal authorities as undelivered, however, it is a rebuttable presumption and the addressee could rebut through evidences that the speed post has not been delivered to him. This principle has been laid down by the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Indore Municipal Corporation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, [2016 (338) ELT 567 (MP)].
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vedanta Ltd vs Jodhpur 1 on 2 December, 2019

18. No doubt delivery through speed post in ordinary course be presumed to have been complied with the provisions of Section 37C of CEA, 1944 ,unless the speed post returned back by the postal authorities as undelivered, however, it is a rebuttable presumption and the addressee could rebut through evidences that the speed post has not been delivered to him. This principle has been laid down by the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Indore Municipal Corporation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, [2016 (338) ELT 567 (MP)].
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - D Gupta - Full Document
1