Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 497 (1.38 seconds)
Documents citing Madan Mohan Singh vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 17 August, 2010

Chitra @ Bebi vs State Of Up And Another on 16 July, 2021

The Court noted that the suicide note expressed a state of anguish of the deceased and "cannot be depicted as expressing anything intentional on the part of the accused that the deceased might commit suicide". Reversing the judgment [Madan Mohan Singh v. State of Gujarat, 2008 SCC OnLine Guj 568] of the High Court, the petition under Section 482 was allowed and the FIR was quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Bhagwan Singh Meena vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 March, 2024

The Court noted that the suicide note expressed a state of anguish of the deceased and "cannot be depicted as expressing anything intentional on the part of the accused that the deceased might commit suicide". Reversing the judgment [Madan Mohan Singh v. State of Gujarat, 2008 SCC OnLine Guj 568] of the High Court, the petition under Section 482 was allowed and the FIR was quashed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sharad Darade Superintendent Of Police vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 8 September, 2022

21. Perusal of the said suicide note would not reveal as to on what date the deceased has written the suicide note. However, even taking the allegations to be true at its face value, the question would be as to whether is it sufficient to book the persons like applicants for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Perusal of the various statements recorded of the employees working under the deceased would show that the deceased had never made any complaint with regard to any of the applicants. No doubt that there is a statement of one Judicial Officer, who had friendly relations with the deceased, that the deceased was disturbed on account of he being transferred to Darwha and not being permitted to do up and down from Darwha and on account of certain event that happened in the workshop. The question would be as to whether the fact of a person being disturbed on account of official act done by a superior would be sufficient to book such a superior officer for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code or not. We find that the issue is squarely answered by the Apex Court in Umesh Malani Page 95 of 101 Judgment DNH.doc Madan Mohan Singh's case cited supra. (Emphasis supplied).
Bombay High Court Cites 57 - Cited by 0 - P B Varale - Full Document

Prakash Chandulal Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 19 August, 2025

"20. By a long line of judgments, this Court has reiterated that in order to make out an offence under Section 306 IPC, specific abetment as contemplated by Section 107 IPC on the part of the accused with an intention to bring about the suicide of the person concerned as a result of that abetment is required. It has been further held that the intention of the accused to aid or instigate or to abet the deceased to commit suicide is a must for attracting Section 306 IPC [See Madan Mohan Singh vs. State of Gujarat].
Gujarat High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - N S Desai - Full Document

Babloo @ Chhatrapal Sharma vs State Of U.P. And Another on 31 July, 2024

In the decision of a two-Judge Bench of this Court, delivered by V.S. Sirpurkar, J., the test laid down in Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426] was applied and the Court held : (Madan Mohan Singh case [Madan Mohan Singh v. State of Gujarat, (2010) 8 SCC 628 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 1048 : (2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 682] , SCC p. 631, paras 10-11) "10. We are convinced that there is absolutely nothing in this suicide note or the FIR which would even distantly be viewed as an offence much less under Section 306 IPC. We could not find anything in the FIR or in the so-called suicide note which could be suggested as abetment to commit suicide. In such matters there must be an allegation that the accused had instigated the deceased to commit suicide or secondly, had engaged with some other person in a conspiracy and lastly, that the accused had in any way aided any act or illegal omission to bring about the suicide.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document

Sankaranarayanan vs State Rep. By on 25 September, 2019

In a recent judgment of this Court in the case of Madan Mohan Singh v. State of Gujarat and Anr. (2010 ) 8 SCC 628, this Court quashed the conviction under Section 21/29 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3168 of 2018 306 IPC on the ground that the allegations were irrelevant and baseless and observed that the High Court was in error in not quashing the proceedings.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - G K Ilanthiraiyan - Full Document

Arnab Manoranjan Goswami vs The State Of Maharashtra on 27 November, 2020

48 Madan Mohan Singh vs State of Gujarat24 was specifically a case which arose in the context of a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC where the High Court had dismissed the petition for quashing an FIR registered for offences under Sections 306 and 294(B) of the IPC. In that case, the FIR was registered on a complaint of the spouse of the deceased who was working as a driver with 23 (2010) 12 SCC 190 24 (2010) 8 SCC 628 36 PART I the accused. The driver had been rebuked by the employer and was later found to be dead on having committed suicide. A suicide note was relied upon in the FIR, the contents of which indicated that the driver had not been given a fixed vehicle unlike other drivers besides which he had other complaints including the deduction of 15 days‘ wages from his salary. The suicide note named the accused–appellant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 71 - Cited by 529 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next