Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Gujarat Energy Tranmission ... vs Pravin B Raval on 28 August, 2017

Pachchim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd vs R B Patel on 13 October, 2023

37. We may also note the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Gujarat Energy Page 42 of 54 Downloaded on : Fri Oct 13 20:51:12 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/LPA/15/2017 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 13/10/2023 undefined Transmission Corporation Limited and others vs. Pravin B. Raval, (supra), relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellants, which relates to an employee of Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd., who was facing conviction for the offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Division Bench of this Court therein had considered the General Standing Order-7 ('GSO-7' for short) to record that as per GSO-7, the concerned employee had become ineligible to be continued in service on his conviction by the competent criminal court. The above noted decisions of the Apex Court have been noticed therein to hold that such an employee though shall be entitled to all the retirement / pensionary benefits including the amount of Gratuity etc. on his being acquittal by the High Court in appeal and the conviction being set aside, as if, the order of dismissal dos not exist, but he shall not be entitled to back-wages / full back-wages from the date of dismissal till he attained the age of superannuation which he had reached before acquittal.
Gujarat High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - S Agarwal - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Bhalchandra Lakshmishankar Dave on 20 June, 2018

(13) Apart from the fact that as the petition was  barred   by  res   judicata  it   could   not   have  been entertained, in the considered opinion  of this Court, in absence of any directions  issued   for   quashing   and   setting   aside   the  dismissal  order,  the relief  seeking retiral  benefits cannot be granted. Rule 25(i)(e) of  Pension   Rules,   2002   prohibits   the  consideration of the service rendered by an  employee   prior   to   his   resignation,   removal  and dismissal as qualifying service for the  purpose of pension. Thus, till the dismissal  order dated 14.03.2005 remains in existence,  no   relief   of   granting   the   pay,   pension   or  retirement   benefits   can   be   granted   to   the  respondent­employee.   The   judgement   cited   at  the   bar   in   the   case   of  Gujarat   Energy   Transmission   Corporation   Ltd.   &   Ors.   Vs.   Pravin   B.   Raval  (supra)  and  Hukmi   Chand  (supra)  cannot   come   to   the   rescue   of   the  respondent as the same will not apply to the  facts of the present case.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1