Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (1.10 seconds)
Documents citing Bikramjeet Sood vs State Of Punjab & Others on 15 September, 2010

Kulwant Rai And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 June, 2011

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners by placing reliance upon Annexure P-2, order dated 15.9.2010 passed by this Court in CWP No. 16549 of 2010 (Bikramjeet Sood v. State of Punjab and others) submitted that the petitioners have received the amount of enhanced compensation in respect of agricultural land on which no tax was payable. Therefore, the tax deducted as source by the Land Acquisition Officer while depositing the amount with the Additional CWP No. 10333 of 2011 -3- District Judge, Ambala was unsustainable and, thus, the petitioners are entitled to refund of the same.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Parmanand vs Shri Ram Avtar Gupta And Another on 20 September, 2011

It was submitted that this Court in Bikramjeet Sood's case (supra) had issued directions to the Chief Secretaries of the State of Punjab and Haryana and also to Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh to issue appropriate directions to all concerned not to deduct tax at source on payment of compensation due to the claimant in respect of the agricultural land acquired by the State. It was urged that inspite of aforesaid general directions, tax at source was being deducted from payments made to the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Hem Chander vs Shri Ram Avtar Gupta And Another on 14 October, 2011

It was submitted that this Court in Bikramjeet Sood's case (supra) had issued directions to the Chief Secretaries of the Punjab and Haryana and also to Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh to issue appropriate directions to all concerned not to deduct tax at source on payment of compensation due to the claimant in respect of the agricultural land acquired by the State. It was urged that inspite of aforesaid general directions, tax at source was being deducted from payments made to the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Balbir Singh And Others vs Ram Pal And Others on 15 December, 2011

It was submitted that this Court in Bikramjeet Sood's case (supra) had issued directions to the Chief Secretaries of the State of Punjab and Haryana and also to Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh to issue appropriate directions to all concerned not to deduct tax at source on payment of compensation due to the claimant in respect of the agricultural land acquired by the State. It was urged that inspite of aforesaid general directions, tax at source was being deducted from payments made to the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Piara Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 4 July, 2012

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were entitled to refund of the deduction of tax at source in respect of the amount received by them on account of enhanced compensation on acquisition of the agricultural land. Reliance was placed upon the Division Bench judgments of this Court in CWP No. 9912 of 2009 (Risal Singh and another v. The Union of India and others) decided on 11.1.2010 (Annexure P-5) and CWP No. 16549 of 2010 (Bikramjeet Sood v. State of Punjab and others) decided on 15.9.2010 (Annexure P-6).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Date Of Decision: 6.09.2013 vs The Union Of India And Others on 6 September, 2013

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners by placing reliance upon Annexure P-2, order dated 15.9.2010 passed by this Court in CWP No. 16549 of 2010 (Bikramjeet Sood v. State of Punjab and others) submitted that the petitioners have received the amount of enhanced compensation in respect of agricultural land on which no tax was payable. Therefore, the tax deducted as source by the Land Acquisition Officer while depositing the amount with the Additional District Judge, Ambala was unsustainable and, thus, the petitioners are entitled to refund of the same.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document
1   2 Next