citedby: 1845563

Presently At vs The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 26 July, 2010

No. 41/10 8 of 12 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del). Therefore, where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under Section 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manphool Singh S/O Sh. Surat Ram vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 13 October, 2010

Thus the sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del). Therefore, where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under Section 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304 A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivaji vs State on 28 September, 2010

Thus the sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del). Therefore, where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under Section 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S/O Sh. Mohd. Jabbar vs State (G.N.C.T Of Delhi) on 6 October, 2010

Thus the sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del). Therefore, where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under Section 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jwala Singh vs State (Nct Of Delhi ) on 15 November, 2010

Thus the sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See, Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del). Therefore, where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under Section 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jatinder Singh S/O Sh. Rajinder Singh vs The State on 1 December, 2010

Thus the sentence imposed under Section 279 was set aside (See Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del). Therefore, where a person is convicted and sentenced under Section 304A IPC a separate conviction under Section 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under Sec. 304- A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishnu Kumar vs The State ( Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi ) on 11 November, 2009

Thus the sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del). Therefore, where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under Section 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304-A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajender vs The State ( Govt Of Nct Delhi ) on 28 March, 2008

Thus the sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del).. Therefore,where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under s 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304-A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Additional Sessions Judge vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 5 April, 2008

Thus the sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del).. Therefore,where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under s 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

At Present: H. No. 183 vs State on 2 June, 2008

Thus the sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996 (1) Crimes 465 (Del). Therefore, where a person is convicted and sentenced under section 304A IPC a separate conviction under Section 279, for the minor offence which is included in the offence under s 304A, is not justified.

Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results