Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.44 seconds)
Documents citing Ramesh Kumar vs Dtc on 15 May, 2007

Prudent Enough To Have Verified The Cash ... vs . Anoop Singh, on 26 April, 2010

Furthermore, in the recent ruling of our High Court in Ramesh Chand v/s DTC in WP No. 14148 of 2009 DD : 23.02.2010, held that "therefore, there as a long gap of 13 years and due to this gap the petitioner should have led a positive evidence to plead and prove that he was not gainfully employed after the date of his termination. In the absence of any evidence led by the petitioner, I do not find that the finding given by the Ld. Labur Court denying the back wages to the petitioner can be held to be perverse or illegal.'
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

13. In The Ruling Of Dtc vs . Sardar Singh, Ari 2004 Sc 4161, The ... on 15 March, 2010

In a recent ruling his lordship Justice Kailash Gambhir held in Ramesh 9/8 Chand v/s DTC in WP No. 14148 of 2009 DD : 23.02.2010 that ''Therefore, there as a long gap of 13 years and due to this gap the petitioner should have led a positive evidence to plead and prove that he was not gainfully employed after the date of his termination. In the absence of any evidence led by the petitioner, I do not find that the finding given by the Ld. Labour Court denying the back wages to the petitioner can be held to be perverse or illegal''.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

In Ramesh Chand vs Dtc In Wp No. 14148 Of 2009 Dd : ... on 6 April, 2010

He was cautioned in the year 1985 and later he was advised to be careful as he has committed certain irregularities. Such incidents have repeated thrice after the cautioning and the advises, the workman was again imposed with a major penalty of stoppage of next two increments in the year 1991 for having not issued tickets after collection of full fare. In the above un-controverted facts, regarding the service antecedents, I am of the opinion that the workman is not eligible for grant of back wages. Furthermore, in the recent ruling of our Hon'ble High Court in Ramesh Chand v/s DTC in WP No. 14148 of 2009 DD : 23.02.2010, held that "therefore, there as a long gap of 13 years and due to this gap the petitioner should have led a positive evidence to plead and prove that he was not gainfully employed after the date of his termination. In the absence of any evidence led by the petitioner, I do not find that the finding given by the Ld. Labur Court denying the back wages to the petitioner can be held to be perverse or illegal.' The grant of back wages is a matter of mere discretion.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

) Whether The Domestic Enquiry Was Not ... vs Sardar Singh on 8 April, 2010

In the recent ruling of our Hon'ble High Court in Ramesh Chand v/s DTC in WP No. 14148 of 2009 DD : 23.02.2010, held that "therefore, there as a long gap of 13 years and due to this gap the petitioner should have led a positive evidence to plead and prove that he was not gainfully employed after the date of his termination. In the absence of any evidence led by the petitioner, I do not find that the finding given by the Ld. Labur Court denying the back wages to the petitioner can be held to be perverse or illegal.'
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hon'Ble High Court In Dtc vs . Anoop Singh, 133 (2006) Dlt 148. on 20 April, 2010

Furthermore, in the recent ruling of our High Court in Ramesh Chand v/s DTC in WP No. 14148 of 2009 DD : 23.02.2010, held that "therefore, there as a long gap of 13 years and due to this gap the petitioner should have led a positive evidence to plead and prove that he was not gainfully employed after the date of his termination. In the absence of any evidence led by the petitioner, I do not find that the finding given by the Ld. Labur Court denying the back wages to the petitioner can be held to be perverse or illegal.'
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Court In Ramesh Chand vs Dtc In Wp No. 14148 Of 2009 Dd : on 7 April, 2010

A major penalty of stoppage of next two increments is passed against him in the year 1990. He was censured and also 9/11 one more major penalty of stoppage of next increment twice in the year 1991 is seen. The past record is not favourable to grant him the back wages. Furthermore, in the recent ruling of our Hon'ble High Court in Ramesh Chand v/s DTC in WP No. 14148 of 2009 DD :
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1